Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentCongestionThreshold be 2 or 3? (#2556)
Mark Nottingham <notifications@github.com> Thu, 23 May 2019 09:31 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A811201A3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2019 02:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iwdp6vQpRNE0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2019 02:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A3712025A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2019 02:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=1eLgwdPzmlEf0MIvcfV2TGPGCY0=; b=BHhR9wGBRIkvSsOj BSBRJchLyriyMwwZQeA6my+DS8wz+F9e1hcRpDGtpXe+Zur1ajBrdqMHgCfZu0Qy tN7LwZ7KWdV7ShKPuFSb2TjA6scgY1zI4V0Uh5tJqIUlBQ2n8lJ7BZxP04m3/4as Q/65aQx+OHFCvQyC3NZlsdpPSQs=
Received: by filter0639p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0639p1iad2-4301-5CE6688A-F 2019-05-23 09:31:54.307102882 +0000 UTC m=+824477.303279232
Received: from github-lowworker-89d05ac.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [140.82.115.12]) by ismtpd0035p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id QJ5v_cHKSkaKxB9fYy91Xg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2019 09:31:54.167 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-89d05ac.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D108AE0265 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2019 02:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 09:31:54 +0000
From: Mark Nottingham <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZEM3TPZMD3MGUAP3526ONQVEVBNHHBSW4UGY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2556/495142399@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2556@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2556@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentCongestionThreshold be 2 or 3? (#2556)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ce6688a1aa7c_1df73fd2fa0cd96c4428cd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mnot
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak26smE4JwqPbPfesNyAdDlOC6gEjXhPQW9din cWvN1mqf7wa0Ussyqnx8TJyhh8PbJkyKlfbmkjm/HHi2P4abUn/96QDT8H9FeWI08qMWVaejLBMrOC NzgYh4S4EiEccoKpFcVUZIyRKmeMtdbWsAxEWWup7bnO+DGNsBrJ8VmCAFTKUZea5wgV94FTgn/Rts k=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/oah-2JE2rdjYcCvpbz7bGGp92yo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 09:32:06 -0000
Discussed in London; best to bring this up at a full IETF meeting. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2556#issuecomment-495142399
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentCongestion… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentConges… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentConges… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentConges… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentConges… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentConges… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentConges… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentConges… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentConges… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentConges… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should kPersistentConges… ianswett