Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate allowing peer to create enough unidirectional streams for HTTP and QPACK (#2762)

Alessandro Ghedini <notifications@github.com> Fri, 31 May 2019 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5468E120122 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B6vbNoCnbXqj for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o10.sgmail.github.com (o10.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CABE0120058 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=C7x+GXF/BMiYei6v6SfCGPiy9I0=; b=SdeyHXbdGgsEf8NI hOGfoZmZjkKbfxNER7RiE1E3OxSJdcMFYbh7mTfSpBS9c6u7QDRu4kM0dqIS5zJY CkP2geGfO0UZjOL44YXEzwFNBiT91NGH6gF4dQi7NJ6RkcAaWDsU5nfG7M499KZX wKu96JTW9dYtql2/WCWKpA/nLrk=
Received: by filter0740p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0740p1las1-17049-5CF18CF3-2 2019-05-31 20:22:11.340216694 +0000 UTC m=+168641.749246494
Received: from github-lowworker-e51511d.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [140.82.115.71]) by ismtpd0024p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id FC-ArYnXQG2O3efIHRWjHA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 20:22:11.200 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-e51511d.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200E580E33 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 13:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 20:22:11 +0000
From: Alessandro Ghedini <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7QKO4XQDJDRSGSZJV2727XHEVBNHHBVYEEBE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2762/review/244503116@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2762@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2762@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate allowing peer to create enough unidirectional streams for HTTP and QPACK (#2762)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cf18cf31c85b_27613f858fccd96468188"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ghedo
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1HAJwt2rDKjZwWEQjBmmkYQBEPOQf/lTNUYb iYD2+ZtnazEPX+olUS9KWPnCDuGt49OEw79cLH0PopEIqF908IXHRyAJv5Pv67bZUrDLhFYUdYZehb mTkAuTNBMSuw2uvlYdC985j0IGXhQi7v6ug2OLU9giPY3UPPGJzE5bzBbDy0KAHItJXLXKU4+NkSYG Q=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/rYqtzH-eqmC9bxdWDOf9vd8gDRg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 20:22:14 -0000

ghedo commented on this pull request.



> @@ -912,10 +912,20 @@ Endpoints that set low values for the QUIC transport parameters
 chance that the remote peer reaches the limit early and becomes blocked. In
 particular, the value chosen for `initial_max_uni_streams` should consider that
 remote peers may wish to exercise reserved stream behaviour ({{stream-grease}}).
-To reduce the likelihood of blocking, both clients and servers SHOULD send a
-value of three or greater for the QUIC transport parameter
-`initial_max_uni_streams`, and a value of 1,024 or greater for the QUIC
-transport parameter `initial_max_stream_data_uni`.
+To reduce the likelihood of blocking, both clients and servers MUST allow
+the peer to create one unidirectional stream for the HTTP control stream plus
+the number of unidictional streams required by mandatory extensions (such as
+QPACK), by setting an appropriate value for the QUIC transport parameter
+`initial_max_uni_streams` (three being the minimum value required for the base
+HTTP/3 protocol and QPACK), and SHOULD use a value of 1,024 or greater for the
+QUIC transport parameter `initial_max_stream_data_uni`.
+
+Note that an endpoint is not required to grant additional credits to create more
+unidirectional streams if its peer consumes all the initial credits before
+creating the key unidirectional streams. Endpoints SHOULD create the HTTP

Yes, that's better, fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2762#discussion_r289538353