Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Resolve conflicting advice on how to handle Retire Prior To (#3204)

[Eric Kinnear <[e-mail]>]

erickinnear commented on this pull request.



> @@ -5392,15 +5391,10 @@ sequence number, or if a sequence number is used for different connection
 IDs, the endpoint MAY treat that receipt as a connection error of type
 PROTOCOL_VIOLATION.
 
-The Retire Prior To field is a request for the peer to retire all connection IDs
-with a sequence number less than the specified value.  This includes the initial
-and preferred_address transport parameter connection IDs.  The peer SHOULD
-retire the corresponding connection IDs and send the corresponding
-RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames in a timely manner.
-
-The Retire Prior To field MUST be less than or equal to the Sequence Number
-field.  Receiving a value greater than the Sequence Number MUST be treated as a
-connection error of type FRAME_ENCODING_ERROR.
+The Retire Prior To field (see {{retiring-cids}}) includes the initial and
+preferred_address transport parameter connection IDs and MUST be less than or

Changed in f11934f

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3204#discussion_r344552362