IETF Logo Mail Archive

[quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: is the recommended size of max bidi streams normative? (#2337)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Wed, 16 January 2019 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC696130E5F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:38:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVAHNrN75F_B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:38:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D98DA130E46 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:38:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=LF9dl57bYuyTljueHhITx+V9lYA=; b=R1dRbPJ84x3fLm/w am4upacYM1fTrvGhhwHSJb56SAiq26nG+58OKdfqrudP5SVdGy1u/lNjcm4YvzSz lOxg1yE97ZdfV0V2OiieUaevurDclqG/p3r1ATwZVLDzq+1VIEtGhmPW/g0zNYt4 lR1CF9ZzivRVSkIQvOVJgqqEc3c=
Received: by filter0276p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0276p1iad2-22372-5C3F41FC-20 2019-01-16 14:38:52.57128476 +0000 UTC m=+144229.247562717
Received: from github-lowworker-05ceafd.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.40]) by ismtpd0020p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id fX9RHiywRGyHtdemIaMuFw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:38:52.306 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-05ceafd.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8C5461859 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:38:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:38:52 +0000
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab5fe0356973fdd28a92570a59ce70885e7636540992cf00000001185703fc92a169ce17d50c0c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2337@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: is the recommended size of max bidi streams normative? (#2337)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c3f41fc7b49e_39e33fd2016d45bc179649"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1cISyZsNe/JS019EoxGBZKwbQdBZzyUMAtRA Kgy+RrdaZWwMf1WagfU6w4IWZuqi9BSJJvBgULjfzhp4rV0snRS6GyJoo15+ISNSNzMWZzBDcr3txS 7FoPOcbGCjeDC63MUzkjsMQQkOQ/AYYwytTTrLOEmmcSgDAmITVEwxbrjc7tTYU5YpmUYE3FvWxpwy g=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/wM9uT6kMwyyllnXk3gFJabYmEno>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:38:56 -0000

> It is recommended that initial_max_bidi_streams be no smaller than 100, so as to not unnecessarily limit parallelism.

Is this normative? It can be detected...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2337

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email