IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CANCEL_PUSH, MAX_PUSH_ID and GOAWAY specify the length of the ID twice (#1620)

afrind <notifications@github.com> Thu, 02 August 2018 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4113130DD3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 15:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcYjF7-iVsxx for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o3.sgmail.github.com (o3.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 375D9130F1F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=hrRdOtn70uurd1tuvZ89H+xVido=; b=kY8jDQ0mZFeoTzve dE0ybHtpVUZxVitFK2riOymL5+IesE3odJ7vKBLePrZqNIjjX/SArnxMDg1lgxRg g448VXZS6UTenMCZ4lLJgK4ZzTI5QiAbmOoTdDCCAj1aYJD/RXX8UkZOVRIz5ESE NiRtG+ZDbZdRtcy+vC0rNc9XaZw=
Received: by filter1188p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1188p1las1-12708-5B6384EE-15 2018-08-02 22:25:50.803436731 +0000 UTC m=+691456.080844115
Received: from github-lowworker8-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.42]) by ismtpd0025p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id OkvCtNTiRbulBkYbidxFPw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 22:25:50.523 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker8-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3305607AC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 15:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 22:25:50 +0000
From: afrind <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abdf082df84e7d4fe9bc5db5e605f92f171b66938892cf00000001177b46ee92a169ce14a3a07f@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1620/410087118@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1620@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1620@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CANCEL_PUSH, MAX_PUSH_ID and GOAWAY specify the length of the ID twice (#1620)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b6384eea1d75_300d3fbfad8be61816095d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: afrind
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1dlvhyyhWsJEhi1ei3MW9OpwXPaEf0obMAzT fQEDDEsGDYmZRMf/VW8CvkDd+kk+EQcoU5DAetZ1sFSNKSYjOITUtjbwLE4FRqaiXBUCO0iLUQdnNN 2SXq4iJMWpGKgA8l+PDlGUt/+rGt1d6RbCj0oYAe96JqUwR/U5Kaxt1/Yw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/xUK0edQTJC7WPS0ySu-ZRoxZSqo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 22:25:57 -0000

I think what I'm asking about, for both frames and SETTINGS in the linked issue, is whether QUIC varints are the best choice for representing integers in HQ.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1620#issuecomment-410087118

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email