Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decision
Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com> Wed, 03 October 2018 07:45 UTC
Return-Path: <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29848131090 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 00:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErIyK-yOff1d for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 00:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 802FF1310F8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 00:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 36-v6so4595948oth.11 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZuhOVtzQNOWTrwfS6xAJpbI8qHx8aEKGUiNuk2Ew8Xg=; b=UeZunMR6ilnziTJ8B48ZFuMYmW5f+KXhsn24Zukwy11dizjsVaWEOnk6QsD/tji5Wy elgA8rN+6gMhji+vJRmX6mLmW2iAASHV6YOnx/6UrAmYZqbnLxfuQQzy4cRuRekC725W Z3KQ1p5c1BPKYtjgkoz8Kw6pxEncqmAIT6ib1uKpjNQVJRcJGYHXK3vBiUhurTAvBUGz kdi/iYa3IkOgKRzpRjyOVmHSW+EGcxYH8enemc+Y9jfUYJoGE2ucgYPG9GEYPxRw9Mek cbeHTVhi8JoQhtXdpPd2DV1pvveB1iUVSGoTwTcmGLfA5XecnHR81PBIjF9XLcuo65jG pimQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZuhOVtzQNOWTrwfS6xAJpbI8qHx8aEKGUiNuk2Ew8Xg=; b=rWeT/gJyAk4wsh2E7eq6fP+LimKCnoLcD0TewMET6d2dleG+VGTRYv1uGOLjmNcDte KN8WWcKs0c8dwZQ2DQVvy8hyUV+HHkQOs0sTRXoyMLqZ2RIvApQP4iQmK/u1qrDLaRLg plHs24YjMMQmSp4ML4iy9ul2DjHo5ww5NHwmm9CH7qm+v5X/+X1Zv1DI/hY7H3KIn0UT vCwg0CLlmTeux6BecvfA8PPLyQyuqijKpeeisLP35bl7HV593kVE8GI/xAsTTx8AcKkT cx6Ml2udsHCp6mHHDnpRm3Y7bahJ/c+mbfRrJMk0If+RXObptBiU4RrxKK+V6pW/kVyE FaHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogCs+iY4C6qANOHO2bxQMnlfvoaB0If36M8E0/vx4jmvjI+yitE GAxiZlxUzMpBrEykPEgGA4Di+xf8WT9eUHNEwxA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63+kWH+V+SwRrter1QyMbOiwBQZS0kLueO468w12GiTNYE5QKfEghhGJzKmTv0DvV7QisBh4wTmiPi9ridoS1s=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5809:: with SMTP id r9mr142696oth.36.1538552706862; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 00:45:06 -0700
From: Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7221_1538551972_5BB470A4_7221_106_1_4a70bd20-3b2e-d4a6-4832-23024e1119f0@orange.com>
References: <14531_1538460420_5BB30B04_14531_237_4_c0f3a391-9897-80b0-575b-aa73edad0d52@orange.com> <9A63F295-5DC5-4992-9A9C-A98F72C8430D@eggert.org> <22440_1538469028_5BB32CA4_22440_292_2_8e00a462-2bbf-acf0-1195-74269a0c2fbd@orange.com> <3E3DBC15-FE42-47CF-AF7A-1F2597ED2390@eggert.org> <24019_1538484216_5BB367F8_24019_26_1_8e6b0d8e-78f0-56c7-e731-da2ff22cb194@orange.com> <08A9C80F-59E6-46EE-A4D4-1F78F5085CF7@eggert.org> <9737_1538485723_5BB36DDB_9737_147_1_82e0e028-b0e8-5e09-7bd5-e66db97c556a@orange.com> <E7479831-9594-444E-9545-A162E8D9B154@eggert.org> <32072_1538492813_5BB3898D_32072_266_1_8380ff40-29fe-269b-8ed7-4331c9e53f4d@orange.com> <MWHPR22MB0991D93D706031603B077BFCDAE80@MWHPR22MB0991.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <CAKcm_gM+zAEwfimHsorsWprJgS7O++85EOjpQoNY0LviaQ+KNQ@mail.gmail.com> <45751C2A-9F6C-4447-8D70-11ABE8C07F8D@trammell.ch> <CANatvzzCvmbu=bN1C-UCzNaT6EUPVCMPwY53wyFNkKa4HQT00g@mail.gmail.com> <7221_1538551972_5BB470A4_7221_106_1_4a70bd20-3b2e-d4a6-4832-23024e1119f0@orange.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail (420)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:45:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAN1APddaqCxYr5rZVfd5K_LWMDigcRdhj4CihdCVo3F=NH0idg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decision
To: alexandre.ferrieux@orange.com, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Ian Swett <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008f962505774e37e5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/-n4848iFbmCeolyI4i62kGK8VaU>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 07:45:11 -0000
At last a concrete argument, thanks ;) But why would exposing the RTT be harmful in a NAT/UDP-proxy scenario ? Great firewall censorship. VPN proxy to bypass streaming restrictions by country. Hackers that proxy traffic via a legitimate cooperation. Internet access providers prioritising local traffic. High latency onion routing traffic. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
- Spin bit decision alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Spin bit decision Lars Eggert
- Re: Spin bit decision alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Spin bit decision Lars Eggert
- RE: Spin bit decision Marcus Ihlar
- Re: Spin bit decision Lars Eggert
- Re: Spin bit decision alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Spin bit decision Lars Eggert
- Re: Spin bit decision Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- Re: Spin bit decision Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: Spin bit decision alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Spin bit decision Lars Eggert
- RE: Spin bit decision Nick Banks
- Re: Spin bit decision alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Spin bit decision Brian Trammell (IETF)
- RE: Spin bit decision Lucas Pardue
- Re: Spin bit decision alexandre.ferrieux
- RE: Spin bit decision Lucas Pardue
- Re: Spin bit decision Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Spin bit decision Lars Eggert
- RE: Spin bit decision Mike Bishop
- Re: Spin bit decision Ted Hardie
- Re: Spin bit decision Ian Swett
- RE: Spin bit decision Mike Bishop
- Re: Spin bit decision Marten Seemann
- signaling that QUIC is QUIC was Re: Spin bit deci… Brian Trammell (IETF)
- a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decision Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decis… Marten Seemann
- Re: Spin bit decision alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decis… Kazuho Oku
- Re: Spin bit decision Kazuho Oku
- Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decis… alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decis… Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decis… Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decis… Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decis… Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- RE: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decis… Lucas Pardue
- Spin bit as a negotiated option alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decis… Kazuho Oku
- Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decis… Kazuho Oku
- RE: Spin bit decision Mike Bishop
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option Kazuho Oku
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option Kazuho Oku
- RE: Spin bit decision Gabriel Montenegro
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option Kazuho Oku
- RE: Spin bit as a negotiated option Mike Bishop
- RE: Spin bit as a negotiated option Marcus Ihlar
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option Marten Seemann
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option alexandre.ferrieux
- RE: Spin bit as a negotiated option Marcus Ihlar
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option Kazuho Oku
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option Kazuho Oku
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option Brian Trammell (IETF)
- SV: Spin bit as a negotiated option Marcus Ihlar
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Spin bit as a negotiated option Kazuho Oku