Re: a proposed way forward was Re: Spin bit decision

[<[e-mail]>]

On 10/03/18 01:31, Kazuho Oku wrote>
> I oppose to using MUST for the server, because some *servers* might not be
> willing to expose the path RTT, for example when it is running hidden behind
> a UDP proxy.

At last a concrete argument, thanks ;)
But why would exposing the RTT be harmful in a NAT/UDP-proxy scenario ?


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.