IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [QUIC] h2 mapping - extensions

Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com> Mon, 07 November 2016 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jri@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749A81294CF for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:26:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5uD6S9_rmJ9v for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:26:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x230.google.com (mail-ua0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41132129558 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:26:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 12so128472128uas.2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 11:26:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hc3bJhnHrlx5PbVeFs9fpggSWW9KzRCy8JMD5QmEoSo=; b=TTDN2A/4yzv6JLj8De1fV1DkiWJ3IVM6vvCPWEOCHjQndqXlO61SGNOLL3tf3cbqvy eB/xudMlNZvMU0a+EZJsv7XMPvUTRJBUj3KbxEBFDWuwalMl7dFXslmnEZj42FfJCtRx 03X1h9c3kfxu0k0kGoOGMGAfKL6mQPCThanqGnXcEj7JjISFR9oQDrrKADaO+4p+w6A7 Zk2ot54EXtfwXQLvNLwTi569GGBf6WpLm7mVQr54T7n7I7dTiQ4z15hJ0/IrwdVF0GTo 9GGbFcwFRjrcCDaLjcivU/MaBzbkaIpY8vWiS2SzbgNUpuMT3e2wSXoRVsKEjWQh501f FCcw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hc3bJhnHrlx5PbVeFs9fpggSWW9KzRCy8JMD5QmEoSo=; b=TdR+nZCyPY2zvSIGzPDtvJWHQU3931fh3pnm2aTFicS4H1zUil9UDQOhPXrSH0sAoD Oi24GPh5qstblZvLSkjeO0PeGwMBY5wg0HhQnT7+bAJ8zUNTeF6WRAbL67p6uNK85XfW 89J2AWhL+hzDecrIqXsJDEvURKT3ADJX51psBhQeKp9n8ZxWvngSW3bkICBezrD0ihHC ftwu5+WaI8elnIRq1sDbiA0A92Br8sDDk+nGrbWIOscmrtYtJUnn3M8absfJ8Ur6M3XE XRrD2n4+4C3XYE+d8A/gVJkcdkQHfr0cD40CpvadKjqlkpwE2vigGYVvZ9Aq7emTbr4X lW/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveztp3ElQF7tr4R3uTugC2SQdjTAaFn+LGRMIWcArGTNm66DMH+h5TWUHGp0I8mbfnjv7AhUQBP1k+fq6oT
X-Received: by 10.176.82.157 with SMTP id v29mr4916704uav.123.1478546786189; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 11:26:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.82.68 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:26:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNpGf7bcwt3Nyqk0_HPPSoXE-w8ZeYEdo4c76vpuXku0mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNpGf7bcwt3Nyqk0_HPPSoXE-w8ZeYEdo4c76vpuXku0mg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 11:26:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGD1bZa94aJ1C8iqxe4MNrWFsC0mVMYwvTujpBVbL2RyFPwmMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c18f88af9fe9b0540baff20"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/9vU11ab-vga4xQJG5CFqM5N05dU>
Cc: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [QUIC] h2 mapping - extensions
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 19:26:29 -0000

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
wrote:

> Hi Robbie, Mike, et al. Thanks for getting the ball rolling with
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shade-quic-http2-mapping-00..
>
> What is the thinking about rfc 7540 h2 extensions and the h2/quic
> mapping.. particularly the way it allows unspecified frame types which may
> or may not require negotiation.
>
> it seems some of these extensions may have stateful issues across streams,
> ala hpack and some may not.
>
> If the extension were only defined for h2-over-quic that would be for the
> extension to sort out.. but it doesn't seem like we are limiting things to
> quic vs tcp, or are we?
>

Not sure what you mean by not limiting things to QUIC vs. TCP -- do you
have a different mapping in mind?

My sense is that we'll need to
(i) define how current extensions will work with QUIC (eg, HPACK), and
(ii) require that future extensions be defined explicitly  for both TCP and
QUIC.


> -Patrick
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email