Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 11 April 2021 07:42 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671473A30D8 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 00:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=YnLq2G7n; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=J1ohngz0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9cp-3ZERY9n for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 00:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CAEC3A30D6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 00:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2998E5C00E9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 03:41:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 11 Apr 2021 03:41:54 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm2; bh=JWJKtIqjOrX/rLkkglG/m/k1otZI7rhSGGyCRr/MF9k=; b=YnLq2G7n H+BwDBdQXA5c6IgiUexrEgdRGscCJh4eLJHGi6rZZR+cLGB/keYNKS0K7gmBcDYg GKQV0fyByRJuwdzTuRqncKvQh3Yot7LxIJQSViCA7vFFm0b5FpB9OQehPSyFp6uf Sekzczz/bL21HT0+wSDffXI6r1WPu4cjyQD6HGUpFvmliTdtwEcEVRGf5PtYQDFB QSKK9/hNORGh3I3gjmKNiHUmFUEYNM99lWSaqwyofpBmER6YihTnYE7wzi7cAmfX PeRQV+9Q8rQ2w6eA8b534nyHw2yd7aQsIfcjbDZmewFUbALmsILTqXq84AP4dcVN sS3Fhp684NJYYA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=JWJKtIqjOrX/rLkkglG/m/k1otZI7 rhSGGyCRr/MF9k=; b=J1ohngz0NrSTn/IBJkP6P40kb2Keg1c3pKoLo6NnWcnGr OWEv5LEXT0/kPNnKpvKax/rRxxzgwUZwN/l70oTRBdbhr6dZ6uFri9B4QTFXe77o bBebNVFnZmL4w0ejiz2OpG3Ko9blt2ZTAmi64OnTqNUzOmIxp/56/daTOXmnXOEx u06THhbQRdVLFo7GM1Hxbb3Xpk74qYAVhdDkapp0I+d5PYzkVcmkzxaqvzZkVTd1 qNunkwppfLiaEPF/sFzCDLFC/TYIyQHPC+2s64yT9Zi5SWbm8Xiy2/CuuLHTaWb3 K4evlwBNm9RgqI3H4tehv5FWr+yiDRSedxMXuKlsA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:QahyYDxb_BRv68MQY6jg1OdyL_4I7p0FLaLh1kSp6nj71y1kNaSWXQ> <xme:QahyYLTcsBSzRHxmDuujQrfGxq6YgYt0vJcHwE-pzUvligEfC5GJCQVlbIimbQhEE 4WMbGE1qUjUPsFwcg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudekgedguddvfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtje enucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicu uehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudei teenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeehvddrudegjedrudejfe drledtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:QahyYNUI6Drj4kxPrIzoOLp5XIhhVUHe5ssQcnSsvMIHYbHJw8SEIw> <xmx:QahyYNiM-quDDJxcc9y8WJn3ISMEcWdTr98kqfHyepFLxoXtph9Xiw> <xmx:QahyYFDMm7chQ2rZwO1NnFqdGHVzX6lLcRe-L7oSm8mVozRVQq6ooA> <xmx:QqhyYC5bVWe7_N-yXCeP2jhkdPD0ODMmM96D-xze7Wdigt1tq1x1cA>
Received: from fv-az266-924.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [52.147.173.90]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ED67E108005C for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 03:41:52 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============6650054881672261821=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20210411074152.ED67E108005C@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 03:41:52 -0400
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/DMp-pnWlAc77uvMyiDI7TEviDMQ>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 07:42:04 -0000
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-0/💬0)
1 issues created:
- adjusted_rtt (by larseggert)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4860 [-recovery]
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+0/-1/💬15)
8 issues received 15 new comments:
- #296 Dropping of UDP traffic (3 by chris-box, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/296 [-manageability] [UDP Filtering] [has PR]
- #294 UDP Policing or maybe Blocking? (2 by chris-box, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/294 [-manageability] [UDP Filtering] [has PR]
- #290 draft-ietf-quic-manageability-10 Feedback 4.5 (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/290 [-manageability] [UDP Filtering]
- #244 Section 9 algorithm (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/244 [-manageability] [meeting-agenda]
- #243 No need to repeat connection ID requirements (2 by chris-box, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/243 [-manageability]
- #240 Endpoint cooperation for DoS mitigation (3 by gorryfair, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/240 [-manageability] [needs-author]
- #181 Sect 4.7: Also an MF-Classifier for QoS? (2 by gorryfair, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/181 [-manageability] [close without action?]
- #178 Sect 2.7: Telling middleboxes to ignore version? (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/178 [-manageability]
1 issues closed:
- Sect 4.7: Also an MF-Classifier for QoS? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/181 [-manageability] [close without action?]
* quicwg/load-balancers (+3/-0/💬0)
3 issues created:
- Consider giving a test vector of shared-state-retry-token? (by william-zk)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/114
- Consider an alternative name of `AEAD nonce` and `AEAD IV` (by william-zk)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/113
- Consider an alternative name of `AEAD checksum` (by william-zk)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/111
Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+2/-0/💬0)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Editorial edit on fallback (by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/311
- Conn ID and load balancers (by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/310
* quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-0/💬0)
2 pull requests submitted:
- exchanged `IV` and `nonce` for shared-state-retry-service (by william-zk)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/115
- fix #111 (by william-zk)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/112
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
- Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot