Issue push id
Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Thu, 27 July 2017 19:49 UTC
Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7A7129B2A for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.734
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.734 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1OhSimK8XnL for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode64.ducksong.com (linode6only.ducksong.com [IPv6:2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe6e:e8da]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D5E126CD6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com (mail-qt0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A27F73A01B for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:49:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 16so29058805qtz.4 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110QMqNR+QSJDqEw5hSvYrZfeUDSslrNFexKjtwI2THJ6jKrHoM6 bmHZh3uA0l+yWFHJBWAIc7MrR55auw==
X-Received: by 10.237.49.194 with SMTP id 60mr7137543qth.73.1501184946436; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.182.17 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:49:05 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNpSBDbo-9Z2PYC7uRDBHGEwnaV+5X_rf9rmQXVRjHQohw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNpSBDbo-9Z2PYC7uRDBHGEwnaV+5X_rf9rmQXVRjHQohw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Issue push id
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114f6764797fce055551dbd5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/I_7NwMm0XgF3dVu-4aJjpljRhcA>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:49:11 -0000
re https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/701/ which is meant to close issues 281 and 702. Basically a big thumbs up - but they're all marked design issues so I wanted to make sure to make a list comment about the PR. In general I think when QUIC transport stream IDs show up as copied information into http level frames (or worse - applications using quic) we've probably made a mistake. So this push-id-label is great. -P
- Issue push id Patrick McManus
- Re: Issue push id Martin Thomson