IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: QUIC - Our schedule and scope

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 27 October 2017 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649EE13F5AB for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZ7c74OK7OMW for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A49713EDE3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9RGJZJv029926; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:24:04 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=lXWFWQPiqs6Fhbvu2X3EX9UVawr/xy/yumlyZ3AZPlU=; b=atMAJi2usVaBWFvFFLIPf3tvP5Gwc099ty/thzu2FzyHStsled18CQZFp45SDCFj9fF1 /UQoAQ0Fv4lUWKkMvpW1MdSxTcwlvckDCMYttLcQbOyXP15AA+mYMkzDPaydYnUx8FGh meZ6N1W/E0Ez+/0IMkXtFkAmYb+Yz7QqHlDNN2R26TjuXxRsxkjqo+K6zKWh9YXlSIBl iMaFpIecD0kqOoUOmiZ1Lz7sX12v5Rk2eYzjh35Q0BgHze88TwOz2HbYUG7QcOpNKsg1 Ps5Vebijme8YZ3kb9YqL9iHQgfTpLToXMkQE69cYVffjq6z74qEbKJVp3S3onJg0d/Ii 2g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2du4hqnppe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:24:04 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9RGKjLk026391; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:23:59 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2dr1juka6b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:23:59 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:23:58 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:23:58 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: QUIC - Our schedule and scope
Thread-Topic: QUIC - Our schedule and scope
Thread-Index: AQHTTuyfJxlFlbUFqEOgvVjbtyLRUqL4EY4AgAATogA=
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:23:58 +0000
Message-ID: <103AEBDF-49F7-4114-BBEC-076806B49460@akamai.com>
References: <BCAD8B83-11F7-4D4A-B7B3-FCBF8B45CBB4@mnot.net> <CAOdDvNqdXLXEQff03t_YSLMpUpeT74E6XuAMh_C8GNiMM9f_Uw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNqdXLXEQff03t_YSLMpUpeT74E6XuAMh_C8GNiMM9f_Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.233]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_103AEBDF49F74114BBEC076806B49460akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-27_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710270215
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-27_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710270215
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Ju33yTaSFyo2hoC9cegpygviujQ>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:24:08 -0000

  *   I have no objection to updating the milestone delivery date to something more reasonable, but I do think elevating schedule to be a higher order concern than consensus on the RFC content is wrong.

I very strongly agree with this!

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status