Re: Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 drafts
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 27 September 2017 01:36 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A021344D3 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=OaJn6GRB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=oawnVwtQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q72gUMmvpgfr for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E77E51342DC for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C692122D; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:36:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=0/EE6vilHTPsbJjNBR tztjMyy7mMBVFS9WVT/7/hGTA=; b=OaJn6GRB91Nhmpb69qGfmer7OpssVdH8dC egiLbMub4PwKvTntwpm2xcyMNidbzOxdg/AXDj+2JokW1IIjA2Vej8l9EL6Y9jNm w79vHwtsG4dGsNKsTWO0rHyBJQhIU5bsUY8RkfIS1O0sJt7IfmFvZTmexiukBAMb yvG+qoXmIFaaGCq+r34LsJIrxZrvora+fvkZV75AKCingsOG5dWF7f+GM0M65Bwz DCS5K483kSBr65haIcmxyA6rfKsM2i0U5y6waCcxelEBfKDTY+9lhWLCxPu+5i2s 7uCeOJ5z/VEFLj5dq+ZUBL57iIvIWpLhQwKMv6DNMpZeVXBuS29g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=0/EE6vilHTPsbJjNBRtztjMyy7mMBVFS9WVT/7/hGTA=; b=oawnVwtQ iMReyns8zXUNP64e4FRYTLYDUkzMzSl117BjhdYgcFZrd9Uz0oHO3rH4F6D0q5Y+ yzpmqB/zRlQo5UBdY9n8WSu6tXsxhaBlyNZSpherXlFGcPUl98clNySQsBpMmqxh YufRG0+2ztNsoVt/Ya7mPHH4k0xsX3w1feSY0ArlIWTOQigTgVGm354aU/0ZZ5FC Y2fSIM9q5ZVsO7kIAuZJMdrBYz4pzVHToQb+992YcI3e43JXz4013ZGwC+pI+0Id wLmj+OwZ1COPVmjunvGFSyij7V4mibH4geDDE0gm+Txk+FSJeZXFOaYet7BgKPZk LSJhRnC0UFZTog==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:swDLWWaJ5SfU_go_sWMR0VmxJBgFsH7w_wNnEcdqHsisrm3kjIpPQg>
X-Sasl-enc: 9kh/+oQ778KnjZdAfs9uMxYBH/vypCI/j3uEcFHnI4gP 1506476210
Received: from [192.168.1.18] (cpe-124-188-19-231.hdbq1.win.bigpond.net.au [124.188.19.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CD4897FA73; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 drafts
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR21MB01414A7DF3C98F42DE3236C8877B0@MWHPR21MB0141.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:36:45 +1000
Cc: Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <238E43A0-A318-4BF8-9F28-999A1238D2A0@mnot.net>
References: <1023AAAC-5195-4A26-A909-D01041A0C9B5@mnot.net> <CAN1APde1ymh8awVJyROG4dsxr5WqrZt=zyTd=2ePgxAZFqP5YQ@mail.gmail.com> <MWHPR21MB01414A7DF3C98F42DE3236C8877B0@MWHPR21MB0141.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/LprgZd8Zkti9ihB71Yio1c_g0kE>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 01:36:56 -0000
Marked as 'invalid' which covers both 'not well formed' and 'duplicate'. Let's try to keep the issues as just that -- issues. If you have a proposal, there are many ways to convey that: * As a message on the mailing list * As a pull request * As a comment on an issue (that describes the issue it's trying to address). Cheers, > On 27 Sep 2017, at 1:45 am, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote: > > #637 was closed, not because it was resolved in-draft, but because it advocated a particular solution to a problem rather than reflecting a problem by itself. Perhaps we should mark it with a different tag than has-consensus, but I believe its June closure is still correct. > > From: QUIC [mailto:quic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 12:24 AM > To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>; Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> > Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com> > Subject: Re: Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 drafts > > I don’t agree with closing #637 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/637, but a new issue > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/714 > has been raised which largely covers the same issue, and it appears there are discussing on keeping client ID in error message responses, though I don’t have an overview on that. > > > > Kind Regards, > Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen > > > On 26 September 2017 at 02.32.33, Mark Nottingham (mnot@mnot.net) wrote: > > 637 -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- Re: Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 dr… Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- RE: Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 dr… Mike Bishop
- Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 drafts Mark Nottingham
- Re: Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 dr… Mark Nottingham