IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 drafts

Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Tue, 26 September 2017 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330EC134285 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.81
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k4FmTFD0sozY for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02on0131.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B2EC128D0D for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=cbXNFlvnJnPPfZ8CCxVwsqlLdNbZMjp7JVEqcM5s0/s=; b=VJMx7ZnBFNFqZap9gzfVjwJqI4rvC1URYN7uEJdJ1Fy5VkapO/p2CJ+b82Gv9cBfC3NqPcjg1IjolgJqFxuAf87NLIH6ksIpQT9+M6QooS3zbC2ZN6N9vNZtHT8WmlaoynuiLftVQ1U8dRNDFWE/9CZKZ7sE4gLk7/0nZoexafY=
Received: from MWHPR21MB0141.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (10.173.52.11) by MWHPR21MB0781.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (10.173.51.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.98.0; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:45:46 +0000
Received: from MWHPR21MB0141.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.52.11]) by MWHPR21MB0141.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.52.11]) with mapi id 15.20.0098.003; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:45:47 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
To: Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>
Subject: RE: Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 drafts
Thread-Topic: Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 drafts
Thread-Index: AQHTNl79poIBpCEotE+rQzVQVVWDg6LGxB2AgACLnOA=
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:45:46 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR21MB01414A7DF3C98F42DE3236C8877B0@MWHPR21MB0141.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1023AAAC-5195-4A26-A909-D01041A0C9B5@mnot.net> <CAN1APde1ymh8awVJyROG4dsxr5WqrZt=zyTd=2ePgxAZFqP5YQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN1APde1ymh8awVJyROG4dsxr5WqrZt=zyTd=2ePgxAZFqP5YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:6::114]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR21MB0781; 6:FynRVkTS88bknkbbyvfICKocGYKH/jUy1xB8C3phSKTkD8XzUEf5+mWF3W7WWuaG9nnpDtOrZttZaQH5lAwpDiu5NovlhyT8n+bJG3yOXtrrgilNEndYJrRfIpST1ttfTbekZ/luiD94/LmVUJbX8vWBBnXSf8N4TWVDGo9QGfwuAmcNZvH0qmxZVGGmfxjVC0Ek43TfIlS76smgjQnu4jF2s8EBBcUZF6D1cYIv8aBfxeXUgvi+vV9xRCrgYLHB8ipYyVt0WatuyRyiwieeF1T29yBj/6wkf4DSRnO4SUDKqCJYp/Ii0viDxu2h7Mx6BDcK9Vcqez68BYaqpHLw6A==; 5:UZPLeB7M0OWlvj/E3kTpwwQOpNOWfR2jyXrkzef6pbsz+sQmPrQ3Y/tPz8u8bKehtsg8C+CmFgp0K5lH2H2B0y0WNtL/d0wd11b2xxdl6TfTJMlW7vElTiZbZUWAX18vIFBMEj81U2bmpcD9BAOu2w==; 24:qnaGM2Hg+yi2p75Gmzw6qTqSdYLsBUN3hOzD0RyEsFPI7UBp/UkGg6JsVlaPckGv0iGiO+21FFaYzVAs+tghI41oN3UaZVxLpT/nDcYmSfw=; 7:2AxYIA+bit0+Y11EcbpD53c4n/g0gGHZfJxguYrPZe4E6yUig0ZMqeGZTf/dnKXeFSSgBs9rVi5jKBaY29YMjB8MvfJAeTcRadvNV8mMs8d0YzSPHrGUetco1MXT6eb+6zdJ+2Wz1AGFx17qnNJQUR4qTYsXBQ3bIVDhC59IzqXwfT2eOpqAvr+0nP7nL5WzjyqZEU8j/PLjRsZ40bQeHMbk9nguXnjnJfXiGk0kZY4=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: df62b5b6-0166-4da0-c33e-08d504f5a7b6
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254152)(48565401081)(2017052603199)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0781;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR21MB0781:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(166708455590820)(189930954265078)(100405760836317)(219752817060721)(21748063052155);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR21MB0781290D104476E828133326877B0@MWHPR21MB0781.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(61425038)(6040450)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(100000703101)(100105400095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041248)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123558100)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0781; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0781;
x-forefront-prvs: 0442E569BC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(39860400002)(376002)(47760400005)(24454002)(31014005)(199003)(189002)(377454003)(9686003)(81166006)(5660300001)(86612001)(8676002)(55016002)(25786009)(4326008)(6306002)(53936002)(6246003)(10090500001)(54896002)(97736004)(229853002)(86362001)(39060400002)(8936002)(101416001)(33656002)(72206003)(105586002)(7736002)(966005)(2950100002)(54356999)(76176999)(99286003)(10290500003)(77096006)(236005)(81156014)(6506006)(478600001)(74316002)(50986999)(53546010)(106356001)(6436002)(7696004)(2900100001)(2906002)(189998001)(606006)(102836003)(68736007)(790700001)(6116002)(3280700002)(8990500004)(3660700001)(22452003)(110136005)(14454004)(316002)(19609705001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR21MB0781; H:MWHPR21MB0141.namprd21.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MWHPR21MB01414A7DF3C98F42DE3236C8877B0MWHPR21MB0141namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Sep 2017 15:45:46.8033 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR21MB0781
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/d_ZylS9Y9U5RLcrdi0h0lhl2Fek>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:45:52 -0000

#637 was closed, not because it was resolved in-draft, but because it advocated a particular solution to a problem rather than reflecting a problem by itself.  Perhaps we should mark it with a different tag than has-consensus, but I believe its June closure is still correct.

From: QUIC [mailto:quic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 12:24 AM
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>; Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus Call on issues closed by the -06 drafts

I don’t agree with closing #637 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/637<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fquicwg%2Fbase-drafts%2Fissues%2F637&data=02%7C01%7Cmichael.bishop%40microsoft.com%7C9734db73328a49002cae08d504af9652%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636420074550095904&sdata=bjp440FcW7LhWZGoZV68OKFkAFPyxce8AmH42Rn1hU4%3D&reserved=0>, but a new issue
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/714<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fquicwg%2Fbase-drafts%2Fissues%2F714&data=02%7C01%7Cmichael.bishop%40microsoft.com%7C9734db73328a49002cae08d504af9652%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636420074550095904&sdata=bbu%2BXJe4PRDTehlAAGiV%2BQup67i%2FAynE2bF1P2RumZk%3D&reserved=0>
has been raised which largely covers the same issue, and it appears there are discussing on keeping client ID in error message responses, though I don’t have an overview on that.



Kind Regards,
Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen


On 26 September 2017 at 02.32.33, Mark Nottingham (mnot@mnot.net<mailto:mnot@mnot.net>) wrote:
637

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email