IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-lubashev-quic-partial-reliability

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 20 December 2017 08:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DCE127241 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:40:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVx1grHkGVGD for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:40:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [IPv6:2620:10a:4005:8000:2306::d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD52126CF9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:40:17 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,431,1508828400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="232863493"
Received: from vmwexchts02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.23]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2017 00:40:17 -0800
Received: from VMWEXCCAS04-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.20) by VMWEXCHTS02-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:40:17 -0800
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.120.60.153) by VMWEXCCAS04-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:40:17 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=PbqqBdaLBIr/5dVpokSgGyC/yYNvCwq9LcpO/bAfNG0=; b=PeHDM/MyDpRLj8tQPWFX4jjppXdqbIxr505fTwbL4tmjPAHnbArA8g/WitKFO4d835uArxIlRcmtxBn+jKWHqsjXrKJ11TAAHB8uG8w/8Ub7ymlLxSnzmeLy0WkuVKCW7PQCPUy7q2JRWFN36cX0CXtH8Z/8x56lQvcJap2s5QE=
Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.150) by BLUPR06MB1761.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.323.15; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:40:15 +0000
Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) by BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) with mapi id 15.20.0323.018; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:40:15 +0000
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "Lubashev, Igor" <ilubashe@akamai.com>
CC: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: draft-lubashev-quic-partial-reliability
Thread-Topic: draft-lubashev-quic-partial-reliability
Thread-Index: AdN4eekQTxka84DaTqiLnO0Um5bpqQA9D5wA
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:40:15 +0000
Message-ID: <A031B1AF-41C5-4DA2-9C35-44E3D745811C@netapp.com>
References: <c1f5a6d8d21f423a93003f7b69dae882@usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <c1f5a6d8d21f423a93003f7b69dae882@usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=lars@netapp.com;
x-originating-ip: [217.70.211.15]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR06MB1761; 6:233nHGPFdYK4GtHToB0sC+PpTpXlbzUWe87X/fT61VLfGhQkkFZ2HlMm6bsDPVKOy8TUf9VI0kS1yRgo0Wyf7SPsB9ZH8ozc7umHsHIUfVLLa+8akpvHgfCeZ92e9xN7OPDcrSJ+7yPlyf8Lh9Vj1bNmDZoRI4/S1UcC108tHEQoJ3BQ6sBPuL3bHEdteyReIEmeLwsajRxNNtPU0WjrTybHL7MpAaRqduVKsRdZQrwOxJydfYPae9nREboIJkYKF/VT5cb/OIvWf2ZchKK9RsEW4FsChV1YbJtXoCW8DfiDtSkGZ6z4wkZkMb7Tnc8cqu9ZgbdOh/ZI1A50HS/sGQB2TKLumB6rYdl5XfM1rgA=; 5:Uu6pnUR7dVV1OshxCVYNaBMA844LT7oxGYXMJrkFsrwU0/5hIew+7WLDJx7rbCvEB1Gj4ywFsxsJnm9492Tlp/7BPUIvpNOuOa2WLeOdTbPElUy5ICMiGh6ncFbSrZUep0VBSwJgFDnvyMKd69KehO7UNbL5ksl/3SwSTKymUpA=; 24:kfIEZs7CQo1n/nxao4y0yTQmuF2GmFdunhA1p2Hk60ZyaQltBZ+4YGodBjQPotFW5sxJ6qC0AOjKr3AtSNg21itypBLDyNThXc83XwfJClU=; 7:Jt45qQoKK5ohoXxHf6tYZqSn/KNawZgToNNyTeWcDpKraVok0hFp6lUHPRxuSkORWJUaom+SpaLIsHNI0R301GdnqlgsEYT5I+sx9aMU9z1azbIond8aQZYYjS3a8z79e5fEMf7VIq+HE2uSRCEVfPmCZ3GoWnLi0Tl9Ln4t10keLHH0jolEv0aElHftkcVST4iX7Z1hdDGkN8Xp1sMsfML+J756zAHLhP21XowBDcVvhPop44Xi9ZTv8JnSjq09
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 20620dbe-c40e-4f49-38f7-08d547854adc
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4534020)(4602075)(4627115)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(2017052603307)(49563074); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1761;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BLUPR06MB1761:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR06MB176181A6240C2DA18A5BF1B1A70C0@BLUPR06MB1761.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040470)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3231023)(6055026)(6041268)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1761; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1761;
x-forefront-prvs: 0527DFA348
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(39380400002)(366004)(377424004)(189003)(199004)(24454002)(2900100001)(99936001)(6512007)(86362001)(316002)(76176011)(99286004)(6436002)(77096006)(229853002)(478600001)(57306001)(561944003)(14454004)(6486002)(33656002)(66066001)(83716003)(3280700002)(3660700001)(305945005)(2906002)(81166006)(8676002)(6506007)(8936002)(6246003)(59450400001)(7736002)(105586002)(106356001)(81156014)(25786009)(53546011)(4326008)(5660300001)(4001150100001)(2950100002)(82746002)(230783001)(6916009)(102836003)(68736007)(50226002)(3846002)(6116002)(97736004)(36756003)(53936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB1761; H:BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: netapp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_73478A77-82D5-4FC5-831A-55DE24B57A57"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 20620dbe-c40e-4f49-38f7-08d547854adc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Dec 2017 08:40:15.2774 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR06MB1761
X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/N109B6guEy3-ddUCNnNL_HHEzLc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:40:19 -0000

Hi,

On 2017-12-19, at 4:39, Lubashev, Igor <ilubashe@akamai.com> wrote:
> I’ve just posted a draft on adding partial reliability to QUIC streams.

with my chair hat on - and without having discussed this with Mark - I would like to remind people that partial reliability is called out in the charter as something that is explicitly *not* currently in scope.

Give that we're further trying to limit QUICv1 by reducing the scope even compared to what is in the charter, I think we should really put this proposal on the back burner for a while.

This is not a comment about the quality of the proposal itself - I haven't read it. It's a reminder that we already had to push our milestones back, and starting to discuss things that are not QUICv1 doesn't seem like the most effective use of our cycles.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email