Second Implementation Draft Guidelines

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42C6128B4E for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ZWb-hBSUReo for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3977A1289B0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id p66so64654396oia.0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=z/u/rN373aVCgckZ/zfGargFv2cZqkekhLJy13fH1Aw=; b=oSHPHtApeuoDLsRQ9xOm5I6WRJdWVfzDNR19blDCr8fG7ghGEEz0adUBJEH5z7SJXr LkG2Dq5voUvkMmwkYJx87MQtcPV+xLQ8QTKdHmxL7GLyc6hVsYJTCyuCT/GENdVgrU7d T7GioITXuw02ww0HP5SNdXjI4XE1RfEaq+k8xUPn9CR0LhhJSy3xqD+ccL33GEdBrGoU I74kPMYIo8FTKQ495/F68YpHc/UHcuY9belizLDe3bI8Fgzp3ANKloWnc6QB2RTVKvGD mPKMEwyIUpl7q95S/lRSEajSOeVdpuvDkXllhtjNxzZkJLtL2yRbSQzUcITrfZT2kNuO Wgqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=z/u/rN373aVCgckZ/zfGargFv2cZqkekhLJy13fH1Aw=; b=KULH1GaWxkBMua73I6snlUi1VGYTmht5Zbf+JeoiCumo25Gt+FVte2gaEt4AbLgbd9 jsEsHduc0jGBVD9FOV0nbfbpJbX/6qNCFiJhAIWzj73IeUID9JT/yxNIbJxkHbwKy63/ OJfJCNaTgsB3RWmkMDsZAkuvFBP0aOevVbHu9YO3n3q0f8qbWmzHrzbD5aHFV4WQj8xl 4MEDeQWEQg/5egXSp1wTm/9RYNJmIjnh80N7frI1kvQU+3efKhCO5AaHY3m5f6m2Zurm ftYu2IbjAY5lpok99KteFCQ3y+o4KWxCIMKioZ/masUhjyHxGJFxK9KZhfdecTMaYM2s yCfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyxkT1fI58sSz4HWnsA53GJsevPzmBGbGFXtpIomphw0NrpkeqX UHfMyfpcrc40XBdshY7GqPZefUfF7RrE
X-Received: by 10.202.215.133 with SMTP id o127mr6730380oig.136.1498079513511; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.17.83 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:11:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxQqbcuB_naqU+L-ZQ+8CF23oHN37u7OAfPOw_TT2yUBYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Second Implementation Draft Guidelines
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d5a9e3f906e05527ed198"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/P7sZ9pEQql5mtRnnWsc8noL7wi8>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 21:11:56 -0000

All,

As promised, I've created a set of guidelines for what should be in the
Second Implementation draft. If deadlines hold, I believe we will actually
start implementing this draft after Seattle in October.

Once we've reached reasonable consensus, this should serve as a basis for
prioritizing issues to resolve through Seattle.

The current version is very much a starting point for discussion. I've
presented some items I think are important to include, and others that we
could bring in depending on our appetite for work. The final version will
simply have "Must Include" and "should not include".

<http://goog_314636520>
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/wiki/Second-Implementation-Draft

I look forward to your comments.

Martin