Re: Differentiate between GQUIC and QUIC packets

Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Tue, 01 August 2017 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A47132293 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 11:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.59
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0RbvV5iuvjFD for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 11:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4843E132250 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 11:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id d136so14179631qkg.3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HVtxDyNuU8NS6BXA9a/gs67PyDfviSHsGY02vYjhbiA=; b=PEUuXKcvHGGXV64B9kymT+YXkFkKxIwCb0c65zjq2oPnq+a2CX3v1aMQW/QX7uMALw XCapec8Z+rHgrENBayohR0QvoyQhr2FzJM9FNMVkv5RU7EIK4YdmcXNwMHsU83LhnkP1 HMAsQI1dEYJ7QOLdUg2I9XTnILWuXNys7qmNviSvszFcADjiWwcWeUhriUYSpFHF201m qYzr2+AK9d0XTYBhMrQXGRLMWbYFTc/JG5tCpZsw3iDQH/BTxlUf9RDzSC2w4tYLr7Y2 5AHz1IlbwWg8bGfUXy49oGc/7wvui7KHZSLPlktQ92bVKzazvku+2y6r+p9hAe8INgoK Cj4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HVtxDyNuU8NS6BXA9a/gs67PyDfviSHsGY02vYjhbiA=; b=IS2/aBbcbLZnzYQQCwMPLz5J0MOa8Y2W2gMXu9TmqclubFJVkGAYSN8/nHbMYpS4XV csXgDneyA75OoIGEc6T+XReIVBEPMcx3I/A68iO0D7ZfVgVn6mt7o8KYzhznF9Iw5G/p gMaHT3awD07czFzjPi9aq0bbk23aIZvbBHxatSw7XZc/Dz/X9RjwQJiReDT9EAXFduoD HGsvqnvPxBpNyy8CogBXvB6jANuVhpot+FbwtoaT8RYVElVuuTCBP3TfMBsb2gzulZom 83AxeDT6nqCfKYVdPtaPQgXTLjsf3bB3YfOCJxzLqPNGwhOrygInAurxqRb/22OXgzcx EVcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110ZmDSQIM6EkfLOWISetebHv6L+AbwBOHrBl5Xd7dLqlKZzul0k aOF8iI4B3AtDSQNp
X-Received: by 10.55.5.132 with SMTP id 126mr7362669qkf.191.1501612403445; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ubuntu-dmitri (ool-2f1636b6.static.optonline.net. [47.22.54.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c21sm21589328qke.50.2017.08.01.11.33.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 14:33:21 -0400
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Differentiate between GQUIC and QUIC packets
Message-ID: <20170801183320.GB3099@ubuntu-dmitri>
References: <20170801032502.GA28788@ubuntu-dmitri> <20170801032805.GA29894@ubuntu-dmitri> <CAKcm_gNQFEmws7wX5vfKCZ4QHGTHRq=Y4GxO09GxjW66dRPRig@mail.gmail.com> <20170801125031.GA2742@ubuntu-dmitri> <CAKcm_gOK5K=jcVG3V4moTpV0-KeLAWMjtvAqX5aZt6voo4kBng@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKcm_gOK5K=jcVG3V4moTpV0-KeLAWMjtvAqX5aZt6voo4kBng@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/RhwdSzasu_5R0JN00x05s8gvyeU>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 18:33:26 -0000

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:08:52AM -0400, Ian Swett wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com
> > Speaking of clients: is it the plan for Chrome to support both GQUIC
> > and IETF QUIC during the transition period?
>
> Chrome is in the process of migrating towards IETF QUIC, but there is a
> plan to support at least two versions during the transition.

Recent Chrome releases have not supported older versions:

- Chrome 60 dropped support for Q035 in favor of Q037.

- Chrome dev build 61.0.3163.25 only supports Q039: it does not use
  QUIC to connect to web sites that advertize Q035 or Q037.

Looking at the Chrome code, it does not seem that there is a reason
for it not to work with multiple versions: proto-quic server supports
multiple versions at the same time.

  - Dmitri.