Re: 8999?

Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 05 May 2021 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6BD3A08ED for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 May 2021 06:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GFZSkbP-ufFj for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 May 2021 06:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 295D33A0827 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 May 2021 06:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id j28so1986262edy.9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 May 2021 06:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MaZP8p5EXKOLy6WKtbGJf8E/32EktggbCXCxSUesozQ=; b=iXj15lHLemVQbHD51PMXtfXs4/LoY9Tz9db7FIBp1nhtDb5avSj396CCIQZfisPwOt A+9t99G26RNV5ez1ghNhaSEHBdDzEy97aNKYXS8OquVVQoxtErUF7HdfHrLnXQECtCIh lJKB9Uhtw7awbs+r9esZj3zCpRmUYgPTSeIqOhkXvHDCiCYl5/TgI/X/KHF/iem7wKuY 0xVk6g8gUAg4idAfeCz83lxT7jE8AT8aECTOoSsnRZnzJgeg9zXRftbvyLV54obtYYfG 2ubl05uC/JXokkdPw7Mmdyc3cSLqPL29+V5PhHnWwAWOdX2QFSuO7FdJAJKsnB+C/VDP q4ug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=MaZP8p5EXKOLy6WKtbGJf8E/32EktggbCXCxSUesozQ=; b=jb5zYIOlqPz+r+Ecf0wtlrXIGiQV7Tk7wdluTKe1ocaAXqA/pt78Wz3P4+6Z+Uf8Rq 7gJJxacrGqewiwzf40taUDI9fMCQLEpsStgtnJLzOrK9TYY+iLz5W+Bft4Czq+Stsc3M 2xy/6AxEobsKFHkM+KFC3QR+YmdyYzU4ADCYnOfFO0j9DHD1V+rnVOWU3VEL9SPShGMv CTkGTXxiMkJNY/KSZV7Bvxe+sBZAdAH4fz/uvyYSSXZaG9wGPcOJhFh+yIUAzZyu6noQ 3RhUd5sA6Xmc8CTXMeYx4MU16kuVaeynuhhi4iUdmlwF2Kgnf18KyWISuUBFDls/Utw4 6rAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FUqrxDg3qYnR0vrr0cxTXGJQNx9foi5WG5h9z6rXXt9jY5VnL FgDJn2W4EtK5/OT0dUQHCJP2u+60Kk/njQdyzuzgFGao
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLnPsOC+zj95Bk8k79Wol43uGfWLSVAU1mtGVZVWY5UYDlKp7kPviMbgKK5YYu/7sIe4t06YOPB9N3Mdnp0KA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2d6:: with SMTP id b22mr32637794edx.274.1620220901805; Wed, 05 May 2021 06:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e692ad5c-5a1f-106a-a586-3c2573defdab@huitema.net> <56152de9-efb9-f8b0-bba4-b566bc8ef69a@huitema.net> <0fd7e332-67ec-4467-8887-92870cc01f75@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0fd7e332-67ec-4467-8887-92870cc01f75@www.fastmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 06:21:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CACpbDcdCw+-gT1N9qJsxwLqn+Pt+3H+u8JdCnPWYF8Uy8OLkFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 8999?
To: quic@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f515505c19513a7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/WWA2v2F7T6Zur3D5hbgl2X5C_hY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 13:21:54 -0000

Yup, we’re almost there, but hold on to the champagne bottles ....
something about eggs and counting chickens.

Though it is ok to get a bit excited :-)

And clearly, that we were completely coincidentally assigned 9000 is a sign
that the gods are putting their power behind this.

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 11:41 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> These aren't formal; don't get too excited.  Hold on for at least one more
> week, I'd say.
>
> We're just in the process of porting the changes from the RFC editor into
> our repository.  We're doing that to verify that everything is good before
> we give the final approvals.
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2021, at 16:17, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > And of course:
> >
> > RFC 9000 -- QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport
> >
> > RFC 9001 -- Using TLS to Secure QUIC
> >
> > RFC 9002 -- QUIC Loss Detection and Congestion Control
> >
> > 9000! That's very cool.
> >
> > -- Christian Huitema
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/4/2021 8:14 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > > Just looking at https://quicwg.org/base-drafts/rfc8999.html
> > >
> > > I see that:
> > >
> > > Stream:
> > >    Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
> > > RFC:
> > >    8999 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8999>
> > > Category:
> > >    Standards Track
> > > Published:
> > >    May 2021 ISSN:
> > >    2070-1721
> > > Author:
> > >    M. Thomson
> > >    Mozilla
> > >
> > > Congratulations!
> > >
> > > -- Christian Huitema
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>