Re: QUICWG Temporary IANA Registry

[Dmitri Tikhonov <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 03:43:57PM +0000, Samuel Hurst wrote:
> On 03/02/2021 13:36, Dmitri Tikhonov wrote:
> > Yes, this value is fine.  (If you expect your extention to evolve and
> > the frame format to change, one approach is to use a different value
> > in your initial drafts, e.g 0xFF...D0F, while targeting 0xD0F to be
> > the final value.)  In any case, do add it to the list to call dibs.
> 
> That's a very good idea, and I'll keep it in mind. Would I put both my
> initial starting value in the registry, as well as my final target value
> just to keep dibs on it? Or would it be frowned upon to camp on space
> that I'm not using (although with a 62-bit number space, we'd need a lot
> of extensions before anyone is treading on other's toes, I'd guess).

I'd put all of them in.  I doubt there will be any frowning: we want
more participation, not less!

  - Dmitri.