Re: QUICWG Temporary IANA Registry

Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Wed, 03 February 2021 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2250C3A0D97 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:45:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bsYApwhZhD78 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:45:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7EB43A0CB8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:45:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id t17so637560qtq.2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 11:45:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7UaI1YwbQTOHGrUX3PMisVrzbT542VTcX+1HMltis3A=; b=DbfxISfLbh8HVcEDugns9qC3ItUG04BzF/0+JDe913i51kTt8s7L74epl8BBJK2moI 6gzF5J0ibxCoEKBV9xgOKf7r9DGkQu4Gnc+ofb/B8yNBsSJgqLmtc10J99vWyJReSh33 2qFeqxtNotx7h4FEanaUKleZgYOcNWosfzgwIHnM+VFdSx4FF5LA3M9x+yW+fiuzajoJ T72xAKAri68J02oK7Y29pDcn9X02A5bhcjuVZ4fuzkMIin4ek4Emx70MY/j7lFpewDAo 5FDo1kL0i+daUq5h7j4/jYRML4AQuW4HDrXYyi/qucbBQV3Yy++0yS/XHYX+Af/aiQcK ERhw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=7UaI1YwbQTOHGrUX3PMisVrzbT542VTcX+1HMltis3A=; b=Dux2dKI4srQPhlXqyAH6vP0liTvrS2sODuiTZOCnOyQFcw7d1B98kTvxCCPJBMJOvU 5b2kAT5YyCgQlK3zgD4eRGZZ783uLwRXwtj3ek+etHHxwu+yfcPK5shvDV2bnphLg419 5EvO0cQKSIQ49Tl4jvyTLzf8dJds35yIgckUDT7KDau740hciiirQRWOzag++eDxR99k 5bZ1CKK8cqPgBvEGLMV8P4pMNjkqJCvQV6H66Ko+pdji8aOWAZNf3xg1cHw5PseLdrKl mFTbYqAZJ1B3uQmu6IcFAIlT5d8ZeoHGAjNOK0R8cPUKn+89Oh7io0IumFl3O1v3vdl0 5Ogg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531NwtXS2gFo9QEEU4hx+8HTd5LTME9iI3AJIwzo3695T32p5Shz h4tTjhgIAZmMz0LSZz+2eXx2n3Kynq8iWw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQO6emwp0M9vCwsMK1eabsU5o+Fqn0J2mROfwPA5/Phpu5feiki9KckCjV9lKiuftrlZ14OQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5047:: with SMTP id h7mr3904661qtm.25.1612381514919; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 11:45:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from okhta (ool-44c1d219.dyn.optonline.net. [68.193.210.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 17sm2655966qtu.23.2021.02.03.11.45.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 11:45:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:45:12 -0500
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: Samuel Hurst <samuelh@rd.bbc.co.uk>
Cc: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: QUICWG Temporary IANA Registry
Message-ID: <20210203194512.GC801221@okhta>
Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Hurst <samuelh@rd.bbc.co.uk>, quic@ietf.org
References: <d0288167-a324-1264-7daa-d7b29b7ede03@rd.bbc.co.uk> <20210203133604.GA801221@okhta> <f98a39ae-0d7a-2141-9285-5f6033b7473f@rd.bbc.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f98a39ae-0d7a-2141-9285-5f6033b7473f@rd.bbc.co.uk>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/ZZduuNWfmYMPPaxoMnCLlwEhQxc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:45:17 -0000

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 03:43:57PM +0000, Samuel Hurst wrote:
> On 03/02/2021 13:36, Dmitri Tikhonov wrote:
> > Yes, this value is fine.  (If you expect your extention to evolve and
> > the frame format to change, one approach is to use a different value
> > in your initial drafts, e.g 0xFF...D0F, while targeting 0xD0F to be
> > the final value.)  In any case, do add it to the list to call dibs.
> 
> That's a very good idea, and I'll keep it in mind. Would I put both my
> initial starting value in the registry, as well as my final target value
> just to keep dibs on it? Or would it be frowned upon to camp on space
> that I'm not using (although with a 62-bit number space, we'd need a lot
> of extensions before anyone is treading on other's toes, I'd guess).

I'd put all of them in.  I doubt there will be any frowning: we want
more participation, not less!

  - Dmitri.