Re: Consensus Calls for Transport/TLS issues, pre-Singapore

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 15 November 2019 08:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EC5120144 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:58:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYjalZcPKPq5 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB634120143 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:58:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id n5so9830475ljc.9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:58:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UFdb6p6LB45+L7UacoNCQBq2u0gml6d/aOfhUNMGubM=; b=aIiz4EBKWZZMEbB5pr9IynlgmqUSkRUBvnmJ5YhOtptZaBsWrxDdWxgAmZgPiT56I5 sGa2B8j9sOkND7GDHRx7uip9Z/nFtwnJ9JskueTOiUig8q3Ly6ZN0+B1oHht7Ci0A29H oMsn+p/kcCiKElyJ/IEO/g2AJN0ZT18Y0riZHvAHTRXalwilLChJciiprg723xIXsxS1 yvCOsETQ4qF5OndJ/DWDnOcEYVRN+45+cwoPxfuvXr+3FXZRtcWt4f5QKfoTvAYSzE/f iwYffyPWstcVi5zshhgN+0c+7KxtEOlEbeUKZDqhS5YISzkihH78rmW2XhUlAH9x50he CUNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UFdb6p6LB45+L7UacoNCQBq2u0gml6d/aOfhUNMGubM=; b=H68LNWvD5EUuPCrI2NX8tFCA5mtubijXWbP4KDVqKdQpMVD24WM/vU4pCY/m0+wt8g +kpGa4AJ1EFWaWaOSTpCxhHXsn4Wcx/Hz6unwTjwvgXgSWScON03BnUNr9QvpGO/QUYE /b3Sty9WP071QSyGdIh9CDGT2jMFTNUFFAblN8uO8hsM6/npwApt1mpviaKEPG0E2BmZ Vv7Pyz7gN70DQaBFTHbczpeayqNaovQ+c9uc2MEC2gvHjANLH9HZ3qFCsGClIuOA6mt2 NGSfQlc+WP091U7ZTENFUSx4+fJeXTV3tIcCd7PErjSQC0U1zNxiD9EZ7yaZC7m3hdCg jnZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWS89v1l5YRN9wn6i6hQxkRwuPydUc2zh78QTVyXBJzWyEPhh4i 8dO7tWhR4eoXDHQIL5yrcL3LaUQMD4RoZNUzAjLbKw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMi/oYNiirnbJzQbbIpTAC5Sh+9fFV9PtYi2EgUNoHo6Era/6efGauyzN2VquHdVTU75h3FDjgeWHXI4pJvv0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:982:: with SMTP id 124mr10564483ljj.48.1573808328519; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:58:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <67289EB8-3A37-4231-A3F9-FB46509152A0@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <67289EB8-3A37-4231-A3F9-FB46509152A0@mnot.net>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:58:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNP7KjMp-usoa6P+KEBg-wz7uOhMjQZxjOEQi2V65ZJ6A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus Calls for Transport/TLS issues, pre-Singapore
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005dcc2805975ecebf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/dapz-2PU5Tk0BAnuRbYWOK5NnQ4>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:58:53 -0000

I think some changes are in order in 3155 and 3014. Comments made in the PR

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 5:26 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>; wrote:

> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far
> seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on
> the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject
> appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to
> incorporate them late next week. Note that by default we won't discuss
> these issues in Singapore, unless something comes up.
>
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current
> state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>;.
>
> * #3127: NEW_TOKEN and Retry tokens must be distinguishable
>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3128
>
> * #3158: Application close should be disallowed in Initial or Handshake
>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3164
>
> * #3155: The method of identifying "the same server"
>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3156
>
> * #2475: Invalid CONNECTION_CLOSE frames
>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3231
>
> * #3168: Allow servers to close connections immediately when the token is
> corrupted
>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3107
>
> * #3194: reordered NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames with retired sequence numbers
> shouldn't be used
>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3202
>
> * #3014: Handling of corrupt Retry packets
>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3120
>
> * #3095: Backoff of CONNECTION_CLOSE needs to be a MUST
>   Proposal: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3157
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>