Re: An Update about Chrome and IETF QUIC

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 October 2020 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A023A11FC for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TLsUvf2yatun for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 710A73A11EA for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d24so2923331ljg.10 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=b67Kl3WShpl25kriHlq4NwnyTO8cCNnlpKIaaYlj7xQ=; b=C9030nozdR21WJ5x1CvHn/5gR3VElv2RgM0ENtnKyUtZ8biT86Odq2sUPAqDp+7V21 U0SXhtmFL/df3cnrBkf9drBHv01kZtpBHePVBt3yA9lJGUingJwZZJI++YwnXy7XxTjn 4/4D+cl8URqcBR8g8+UGxxmCsnCMREzyyQRKKw+/axvjAYB/CcoAgAq958eAswNC9CrM 0/nO4RD16EQNLkTqyRPP5TpgHrMRYpZXQq7KaK6sYCP0AIHqujkiZcMEBFg15BDzlFhB bUrO5HGzgksIFlVCfXtqgm3mud6wAPuDZ3kVzmcfDCBhoCAQNnrhx6r1Lm50JR+Rcl2F bfOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=b67Kl3WShpl25kriHlq4NwnyTO8cCNnlpKIaaYlj7xQ=; b=V95uF4JcFyuCMBg3t8UNBr8eNE6x7Z9vsOul0ackJoS5E9j7z3dp/AfUnxVZNn5dIq psN7+IHJYPGEd2dxGxx9NTvR4ZcYkKKoZ5+ztDcAxcIbOkcXWeT4PaiQhwlZnNey1hA+ n+4IQJvWCo25xxjsA22fvgXXFymd4ckieEuTKfgMQH1JQ9/xRHTvKxu9MRbJABMoFX1V 75rJ1aJj7JtGS7JSTqxBdb0Gi6yfxPXW0LH3XkzIbuH5rogZmoiLntrLP+jU7PH5G5yw j7wWi260uiLfHjU6nx25mh1ztfD6vEqA89K/Osz09gg8cUJxFe+YwtjFp2Th2U6hVBJc izLA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FsPi7TXnNN6AEWfqHntUOTba4SJvV7GzaNnd877oPy4LwpnGX VTpA2o4z1wcP/EFWlWG7CgRoSPSptLF7ahwgYllWHqIT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNhuD5lFqzxWz+WB5ZbQhsnMTgz27tK0QKnpEdajfri4nnJ7Cae1KXb9B8mzeadnyOpgMS++5vO1Dx1+L6bUs=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7a0a:: with SMTP id v10mr1551962ljc.188.1603215628227; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPDSy+7jKFSLPiw9=iGijT5E-A+GYSisfaL9-pLbFZQ8NfeAFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+7jKFSLPiw9=iGijT5E-A+GYSisfaL9-pLbFZQ8NfeAFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:40:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+4f4K8bMp0zuMOQyc+JOad6OR6moHaPj79-c9JZFazWtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: An Update about Chrome and IETF QUIC
To: QUIC <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000004d77505b21dbae8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/ttfyrBNe-1KTNcHdmVlTHbtMNx4>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:40:32 -0000

Hi everyone,

To follow up on my previous email, I just wanted to let everyone
know that we've now ramped up h3-29 to over 90% of Chrome
users. (We always keep a few percent of users running other
versions of QUIC or TCP to compare performance.)

Cheers,
David

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 9:49 AM David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi QUIC WG,
>
> We would like to share an important announcement from Chrome:
>
> https://blog.chromium.org/2020/10/chrome-is-deploying-http3-and-ietf-quic.html
>
> In particular, we'd like to highlight two points of interest to the WG:
>
> 1) Chrome now supports IETF QUIC by default (h3-29).
>
> 2) Since the subsequent IETF drafts 30 and 31 do not have
> compatibility-breaking
> changes, we currently are not planning to change the over-the-wire
> identifier. What
> this means is that while we'll keep tracking changes in the IETF
> specification, we
> will be deploying them under the h3-29/0xff00001d name. We therefore
> recommend
> that servers keep support for h3-29 until the final RFCs are complete if
> they wish to
> interoperate with Chrome. However, if the IETF were to make
> compatibility-breaking
> changes in a future draft, Chrome will revisit this decision.
>
> Full details in the link above.
>
> Cheers
> David
>