Re: [radext] [precis] saslprepbis and NAI

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Tue, 25 November 2014 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146F81A9125; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 07:50:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AlPaP8wDS80B; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 07:50:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D745B1A9129; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 07:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C70204A2; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:47:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id naObQBUtmK1Q; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:47:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (unknown [10.1.10.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:47:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 0186780FA6; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:50:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
References: <54660EE5.50503@deployingradius.com> <5473EF2A.90808@andyet.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:50:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <5473EF2A.90808@andyet.net> (Peter Saint-Andre's message of "Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:53:30 -0700")
Message-ID: <tsl1toruvnh.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/-J505usx6sMiwbfYFA3JBH-BO8Y
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, precis@ietf.org, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Subject: Re: [radext] [precis] saslprepbis and NAI
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:50:32 -0000

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Saint-Andre <- &yet <peter@andyet.net>> writes:

    Peter> I've just reviewed the NAI specification. Although it does
    Peter> directly not address issues such as width mapping, case
    Peter> mapping, and Unicode normalization (seemingly inheriting its
    Peter> handling of those issues from RFC 5335 for the username
    Peter> portion and from IDNA2008 for the realm portion), as far as I
    Peter> can see it is compatible with saslprepbis.

So, is it our plan to address these issues in the EAP identity document?
I can see the argument for not addressing them in NAI, but they need to
be called out somewhere.

--Sam