Re: [radext] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-06: (with COMMENT)

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Wed, 15 August 2018 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877D5130FF9; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Zr4qhD72-d0; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A619130E09; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.20.38] (CPEf4cc55220745-CM64777ddff610.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [173.32.191.82]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13CAD40D; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:25:51 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <153435801941.3053.15907114318025420750.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 15:25:50 -0400
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Winter Stefan <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, radext-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy@ietf.org, radext@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <926C796E-1339-488F-812C-27A003DF1D27@deployingradius.com>
References: <153435801941.3053.15907114318025420750.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/7q37Vy-49BHe5KOTIQ3ZMxkL3BM>
Subject: Re: [radext] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:25:55 -0000

On Aug 15, 2018, at 2:33 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> S 3.3.
> 
>>     The new Operator-NAS-Identifier attribute is defined as follows.
> 
> I suggest adding the depiction of the fields and their lengths in
> bytes, as is done in RFC 5580. I was a little confused about whether
> the fields in the attribute are just the TLV.

  There are no fields in the Operator-NAS-Identifier attribute.  it's just an opaque blob.

  Maybe you were thinking of the Operator-Name attribute?  That's defined already in RFC 5580.  I don't think there's a need to re-use that text here.

  Alan DeKok.