IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-06: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 15 August 2018 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1629130FF9 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jrd5PckWkJ6H for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4CC130F1D for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id u7-v6so1841114lji.3 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oL9TqKtj/ZmLYaNmscnBLuzjviZOiddaKtEVaJA64uc=; b=RY1oTY0ooKBgHz2ij3i9ixLQftXt6m4W/HocJ/Nq59YsBftChWeWymhqBhTFCsnZJ4 /XfYYGbA8TY8tREpIglLSGpAgInuSbHxkOC/Jqk9JqBJm882IqFUBGL0s0FlxdmUttrl PuPGk2xkXoe5FF+ncm8l9GBI5HsV3WSG0XpC2BxlLWpC6li/ARnIQcb2xxVCJ8CdIzYE dzC463K6Yv7G+WD/iLmNEPllIfhNMQrDD993KRf9QA1w9cCbnXFQM9lmq6f6sr9gzVsb 9RXfFkrQrdVE5fCKJegHNTdQ/dpnBFw3RNrI855ktq0ldLMDzVq0Dk1UKV+vyoBchjXT Rrpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oL9TqKtj/ZmLYaNmscnBLuzjviZOiddaKtEVaJA64uc=; b=iR3Ttv9dzRNPsJ8w34z6xbLOE5Cg6s7xK94pje++JsNQQDN5zqQaebWVyZMTAh15KY l4y36hAIjHJrWDfyJ8VjDXZ3i67KiS/YGa/hYnS1VUWmfs3DGvhjXQxzACzJbLQQguCi BXdhy0WSDKlQjXgHmHGc3D98GcXGL7/QUMZ8ubzXA/AH8JjdcCTI2w+NhB9clt9BWn3u mhjS9NSMkC8bpl+mkZi+ZaLoPEXbefXC7UsbwHA3coADHsKT8c/0wp1R5XuaNjLjZyVJ VGE1hGbgX980iR4iHskj6dWNZpr1kKM3F83MD6VmHMBwwaYArpLaa1PyvzbDwFv8W8gW oFjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEOvUcavQP/U4to7/UkqMUhBuweNahaO7fEGIIwW3VNmsZ4/HG5 GJVBTuyGdfy7a7zoi4gNHq5b8h5y3l2vQ9kGmMBp5A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPyL6RNMpqs0DznB48lGdSGl/zzs1w4Uh/qOIMoEOnryCyDncPuUzuXpx35r9eewV1PWzbqpYN66o3boTPXIrbs=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9c4d:: with SMTP id t13-v6mr18299349ljj.153.1534362290558; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:ab3:4091:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <926C796E-1339-488F-812C-27A003DF1D27@deployingradius.com>
References: <153435801941.3053.15907114318025420750.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <926C796E-1339-488F-812C-27A003DF1D27@deployingradius.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:44:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNo=D21YhcAKXFp0abO4NGoGPiog1p-+GyW+g_4BYbTgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Winter Stefan <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, radext@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy@ietf.org, radext-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000492d8d05737e8f0d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/ERo3VgFYjyCHZxSw_65KR9wi05A>
Subject: Re: [radext] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:44:55 -0000

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
wrote:

> On Aug 15, 2018, at 2:33 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> > S 3.3.
> >
> >>     The new Operator-NAS-Identifier attribute is defined as follows.
> >
> > I suggest adding the depiction of the fields and their lengths in
> > bytes, as is done in RFC 5580. I was a little confused about whether
> > the fields in the attribute are just the TLV.
>
>   There are no fields in the Operator-NAS-Identifier attribute.  it's just
> an opaque blob.
>

I believe what Alissa means is that it's variable length and therefore must
be somehow delimited.

-Ekr


>   Maybe you were thinking of the Operator-Name attribute?  That's defined
> already in RFC 5580.  I don't think there's a need to re-use that text here.
>
>   Alan DeKok.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email