IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] NAI draft: consensus on the name "Network" Access Identifier?

Alejandro Perez Mendez <alex@um.es> Sun, 03 August 2014 08:52 UTC

Return-Path: <alex@um.es>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B341A026A for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 01:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKm3t5gbEb1A for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 01:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xenon23.um.es (xenon23.um.es [155.54.212.163]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBB21A0267 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 01:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xenon23.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2183916B9 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 10:52:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by antispam in UMU at xenon23.um.es
Received: from xenon23.um.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xenon23.um.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6vW-aHULhe59 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 10:52:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.42.0.18] (84.124.144.62.dyn.user.ono.com [84.124.144.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alex) by xenon23.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFC931142 for <radext@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 10:52:37 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <53DDF854.3060909@um.es>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 10:52:36 +0200
From: Alejandro Perez Mendez <alex@um.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <53DB5025.10908@restena.lu> <0E802CC7-3A07-4B23-8494-842423BDBAE4@cardiff.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <0E802CC7-3A07-4B23-8494-842423BDBAE4@cardiff.ac.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020506080304090801060707"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/DM74JZIcDABQQkbxRfFne0s1jas
Subject: Re: [radext] NAI draft: consensus on the name "Network" Access Identifier?
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 08:52:47 -0000

El 01/08/14 a las #4, Rhys Smith escribió:
> On 1 Aug 2014, at 09:30, Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> wrote:
>
>> A few people have already voiced their opinion and an emerging consensus
>> seems to be that Network Access Identifier is a too well-known term to
>> change.
>>
>> I'd like to confirm consensus on the list that this is the way to go.
> +1 from me. Keep the name the same but add some text to say that it’s not meant to be used in the network access context only.

+1

> Rhys.
> --
> Dr Rhys Smith
> Identity, Access, and Middleware Specialist
> Cardiff University & Janet, the UK's research and education network
>
> email: smith@cardiff.ac.uk / rhys.smith@ja.net
> GPG: 0x4638C985
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> radext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email