Re: [radext] [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-10

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 04 April 2013 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9686721F95DA; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XKbcqOstuWD9; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og106.obsmtp.com (exprod7og106.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240B821F958A; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob106.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUV2/c5o/Ze+OBtdgOjoU6RDCALstud1t@postini.com; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:59:16 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956F5108080; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 892CC19005D; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:59:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:59:15 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] [radext] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-10
Thread-Index: Ac4xNYeyVSG79PrhReiNj3Ln9NlMtAAFIhywABNZngAAAFUWgA==
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:59:15 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775131DB4@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <B51C71CC-654D-43F3-A50A-321C171CD562@gmail.com> <515D7B4D.7090201@deployingradius.com> <515db052.24fa440a.4c16.ffff93c2@mx.google.com> <515DBD38.2020607@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <515DBD38.2020607@deployingradius.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B37A51A84BA01A49977B114DE243FE11@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<radext@ietf.org>" <radext@ietf.org>, Leaf Yeh <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-10
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:59:16 -0000

On Apr 4, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
>    This option MUST carry RADIUS attributes listed in the IANA Registry
> of 'RADIUS attributes permitted in DHCPv6 RADIUS option'.

I don't think that sentence means what you think it means.   This would require that these options be sent even if no values for them were configured on the RADIUS server.