Re: Review of draft-nelson-radius-management-authorization-05.txt

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Thu, 16 August 2007 05:51 UTC

Envelope-to: radiusext-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:52:48 +0000
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
Organization: Fondation RESTENA
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Review of draft-nelson-radius-management-authorization-05.txt
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:51:22 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1235753.SEP9XBH9n6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200708160751.32507.stefan.winter@restena.lu>

Hi,

I also support its adoption. After having a quick glance: Is there a specific 
reason for not enumerating "Telnet" as one of the Framed-Management-Protocol 
values?

Stefan

-- 
Stefan WINTER

Stiftung RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de 
la Recherche
Ingenieur Forschung & Entwicklung

6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
E-Mail: stefan.winter@restena.lu     Tel.:     +352 424409-1
http://www.restena.lu                Fax:      +352 422473