IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] #148: Review of dynamic-discovery by Jim Schaad

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Wed, 26 June 2013 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4F921E8119 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1b+IG6dY1c+4 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4334711E80F5 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264B620163; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:54:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0vTrTBycsYol; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:54:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (unknown [10.1.10.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:54:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 3EB4F8095E; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:58:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
References: <065.a122826c6d7c009295065142646863ee@trac.tools.ietf.org> <512E23F3.3000307@restena.lu> <tslip5dn5jb.fsf@mit.edu> <512E2846.5090702@restena.lu> <tsl621dn4gq.fsf@mit.edu> <51CAF86E.30504@restena.lu>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:58:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <51CAF86E.30504@restena.lu> (Stefan Winter's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:19:26 +0200")
Message-ID: <tslehbou7ve.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] #148: Review of dynamic-discovery by Jim Schaad
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:58:47 -0000

Why didn't you just use RFC 4985?
You already have a service tag.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email