AW: [AAA-WG]: AW: Comments to draft-sterman-aaa-sip-03 and draft- ietf-aaa-sip-a pp-03

"Beck01, Wolfgang" <BeckW@t-systems.com> Mon, 09 August 2004 13:50 UTC

Envelope-to: radiusext-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:50:59 +0000
Message-Id: <76C27E1CE3FFC847B4D51C645D6F42AA15FD61@E9JDF.mgb01.telekom.de>
From: "Beck01, Wolfgang" <BeckW@t-systems.com>
To: aboba@internaut.com
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: AW: [AAA-WG]: AW: Comments to draft-sterman-aaa-sip-03 and draft- ietf-aaa-sip-a pp-03
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:50:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Bernard,

>> After converting the draft to flat attributes, I tried to save attribute
>> space. It is a scarce resource in RADIUS.
>
> Point of process.  In the RADEXT WG, issues are not resolved by assertion.
> They are resolved by WG discussion.
Just take my response to Miguel as a contribution to the WG discussion.

> Also, saving attribute space is not a design goal of this document.
> Diameter compatibility *is* a design goal.
If we can do both, why shouldn't we? If not, I've no problem adding attributes
to the draft.

Wolfgang

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

AW: [AAA-WG]: AW: Comments to draft-sterman-aaa-s… Beck01, Wolfgang