Re: [radext] Short draft on using larger packets for TLS fragmentation

[Sam Hartman <[e-mail]>]

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Deacon <[e-mail]> writes:

    Peter> On Sun, 7 Jul 2013, Sam Hartman wrote:

    Peter> Section 4.2 provides for larger messages via TCP and
    Peter> communicating message limits.  It's not even necessary to
    Peter> support 4.2 command code and attributes to communicate
    Peter> message limits.  Support for large messages is allowed to be
    Peter> an administrative option provided it is not enabled by
    Peter> default.

Yeah, I was taking 4.2 out of your draft as inspiration.
I agree my approach does not of itself give UDP interop.
However, this approach works well either with your approach or Alex's
approach, but seems to be close enough to WG agreement that we might be
able to move on it this year.
Once we get consensus on a broader solution I think it can fit in.

I don't promise to use the same framing as your section 4.2, but your
contributions to this discussion particularly in that section are very
much on my mind in terms of what we're trying to accomplish.

I'm trying to separate out what we seem to have agreement on so that I
can start shipping code.