Re: [radext] Consensus call for changing intended RFC status of draft-ietf-radext-tls-psk

Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@dfn.de> Wed, 31 January 2024 10:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rieckers@dfn.de>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE42C1CAF58 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 02:48:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dfn.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FEQbGsIp_RRN for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 02:48:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a1004.mx.srv.dfn.de (a1004.mx.srv.dfn.de [IPv6:2001:638:d:c301:acdc:1979:2:58]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A349AC1CAF4C for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 02:48:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dfn.de; h= content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:organization:from:from :references:content-language:subject:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:date:message-id:received; s=s1; t=1706698083; x=1708512484; bh=O7nH2ocU5evMVcGU5X0LmoQ9Gu7jQzYuZGS0DD1eLko=; b= BKr9qUNXjHcyx+n38WbL5yJOhElmEzGfLejJCmNN33UQLIwEu3OgdIM/Uh+1YrHL HDozAT2uPdPyrJSk7M79icvYwdAIwa897Qp/S3EGpFEEF20sys5YOss+IQpdDm6A gxFMOFqnrxSAacHKazyCGbHdPrLjZfLEei3SaLlAUPA=
Received: from mail.dfn.de (mail.dfn.de [IPv6:2001:638:d:c102::150]) by a1004.mx.srv.dfn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D08E52000DB for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:48:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [100.120.7.20] (local.janfred.de [90.187.196.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mspool2.in.dfn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DB983D6 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:48:03 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <b27c3ea3-e044-45d1-90cd-30e61198804a@dfn.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:48:01 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <003c01da4f63$0109b160$031d1420$@smyslov.net>
From: Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@dfn.de>
Organization: DFN e.V.
In-Reply-To: <003c01da4f63$0109b160$031d1420$@smyslov.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms090300060207020204020907"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/jgYtbZxfbVTa33X5OSko1rqtGgI>
Subject: Re: [radext] Consensus call for changing intended RFC status of draft-ietf-radext-tls-psk
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:48:16 -0000

I am in favor of changing the document status

Cheers,
Janfred

On 25.01.24 08:49, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the current intended RFC status of draft-ietf-radext-tls-psk is
> Informational.
> As it was recently discussed in the ML [1], there seems to be an interest
> in changing the intended RFC status for this draft to BCP.
> 
> This message starts a one week consensus call for this change.
> Please, clearly indicate whether you support this change or not
> and in the latter case please indicate whether you think the status
> should be left as Informational or be changed to something different than
> BCP.
> 
> Regards,
> Margaret & Valery.
> 
> [1]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/l_IhlekaNurr8dqmX8JW9FrTXXU/
> 
> 

-- 
Herr Jan-Frederik Rieckers
Security, Trust & Identity Services

E-Mail: rieckers@dfn.de | Fon: +49 30884299-339 | Fax: +49 30884299-370
Pronomen: er/sein | Pronouns: he/him
__________________________________________________________________________________

DFN - Deutsches Forschungsnetz | German National Research and Education 
Network
Verein zur Förderung eines Deutschen Forschungsnetzes e.V.
Alexanderplatz 1 | 10178 Berlin
https://www.dfn.de

Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Stefan Wesner | Prof. Dr. Helmut Reiser | 
Christian Zens
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Christian Grimm | Jochem Pattloch
VR AG Charlottenburg 7729B | USt.-ID. DE 136623822