IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] WGLC for draft-ietf-radext-tls-psk-04

Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@dfn.de> Wed, 31 January 2024 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rieckers@dfn.de>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2964FC16A126 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 02:00:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dfn.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O3pFY1zOdO9q for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 02:00:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from b1004.mx.srv.dfn.de (b1004.mx.srv.dfn.de [194.95.235.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 182F7C17C8A9 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 02:00:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dfn.de; h= content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:organization:from:from :references:content-language:subject:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:date:message-id:received; s=s1; t=1706695210; x=1708509611; bh=FVWDuxxWPZmhuhtzWv99AAhep5+2QIAEzL/Z++cAiCc=; b= i6vTM6GvkMNEgyrNOSdPvZhYu57dxLme1jV9kwveUA9t2FXjEirst4B6LpaeznkX elUTbEAAMgjwlbGHO0Eu94h8j7anspXWaKISxRRPVGyZzFHYvGIAHZqCYiGFZKx9 439n7c93JE6TYb/UJpe4whUJHqM8EydNyzsL3uI85D8=
Received: from mail.dfn.de (mail.dfn.de [194.95.245.150]) by b1004.mx.srv.dfn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B8D52200EE for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:00:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [100.120.7.19] (local.janfred.de [90.187.196.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mspool2.in.dfn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6C023D6 for <radext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:00:09 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <bba12e9f-c89e-4a5e-b415-9ced31214ad0@dfn.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:00:07 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: radext@ietf.org
References: <005901da242e$f623d550$e26b7ff0$@smyslov.net> <6172ba00-6793-4393-9466-37b52fe1e25b@switch.ch> <651E26F6-B0B2-40A7-B636-88569CFEFCB3@deployingradius.com> <e34c5a26-079d-4988-83b0-c53c3708ef2e@switch.ch> <57B035CF-64CA-4B93-9FEE-929D7DD80D32@deployingradius.com> <3af70e7f-356e-4d49-a1a0-a4c6d270a1a3@switch.ch> <89087622-6499-4B64-8139-75D4464B49A2@deployingradius.com> <02F27A5D-33AD-4B35-BF46-716345E480CA@deployingradius.com> <fa3138fb-875b-409f-814a-ef02d612ce20@dfn.de> <3956CC37-4E8A-4041-8C40-387E8F598237@deployingradius.com> <ae25fac9-47c1-4f00-a655-75d4dd2034fa@dfn.de> <b34e2818-f41f-4d1c-a928-af0ac729db6b@switch.ch>
From: Jan-Frederik Rieckers <rieckers@dfn.de>
Organization: DFN e.V.
In-Reply-To: <b34e2818-f41f-4d1c-a928-af0ac729db6b@switch.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms030903070504060405050305"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/dVa69aVHj41GZqOr2DeAj4cHzGo>
Subject: Re: [radext] WGLC for draft-ietf-radext-tls-psk-04
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:00:21 -0000

On 30.01.24 18:29, Fabian Mauchle wrote:> On 23.01.2024 10:25, 
Jan-Frederik Rieckers wrote:
>> The thing that is currently inconsistent between the radius-dtls-bis 
>> and the TLS-PSK draft is the requirement to implement TLS-PSK.
>>
>> The RADIUS/(D)TLS draft says servers MUST, clients can choose between 
>> TLS-PSK and PKIX.
> 
> In my view, of course tls-psk states both client and server MUST 
> implement it (otherwise the document by itself would not make sense and 
> implementations would be incompatible)
> 
> On the other hand, radius-dtls-bis should state which side MUST follow 
> (to be RFC) tls-psk and for whom it optional.

Thanks, I think that's exactly what I would prefer.

I think the current text in the TLS-PSK draft currently reads (at least 
to me) as if it says "everything who implement RFC6614/7360 MUST 
implement this" instead of "everyone who implements this document MUST 
implement this"

Cheers,
Janfred


-- 
Herr Jan-Frederik Rieckers
Security, Trust & Identity Services

E-Mail: rieckers@dfn.de | Fon: +49 30884299-339 | Fax: +49 30884299-370
Pronomen: er/sein | Pronouns: he/him
__________________________________________________________________________________

DFN - Deutsches Forschungsnetz | German National Research and Education 
Network
Verein zur Förderung eines Deutschen Forschungsnetzes e.V.
Alexanderplatz 1 | 10178 Berlin
https://www.dfn.de

Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Stefan Wesner | Prof. Dr. Helmut Reiser | 
Christian Zens
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Christian Grimm | Jochem Pattloch
VR AG Charlottenburg 7729B | USt.-ID. DE 136623822

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email