IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] WGLC for draft-ietf-radext-tls-psk-04

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Fri, 01 December 2023 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354E1C14F5F2 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:23:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bUCjp6-u7Hlq for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:23:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECE2FC14F5F1 for <radext@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:23:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [75.98.136.130]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF1EC4EF; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 18:23:43 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <37937d44-cc76-4eef-a7d8-cd3283bcbadd@switch.ch>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 13:23:43 -0500
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D6D56A7D-2AA6-44CB-BB1E-7A662CFCFA7A@deployingradius.com>
References: <005901da242e$f623d550$e26b7ff0$@smyslov.net> <6172ba00-6793-4393-9466-37b52fe1e25b@switch.ch> <37937d44-cc76-4eef-a7d8-cd3283bcbadd@switch.ch>
To: Fabian Mauchle <fabian.mauchle@switch.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/PDPFiKolpyGq-3ye-2i7ruotfxc>
Subject: Re: [radext] WGLC for draft-ietf-radext-tls-psk-04
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:23:48 -0000

On Dec 1, 2023, at 12:54 PM, Fabian Mauchle <fabian.mauchle@switch.ch> wrote:
> 6.2.  Practices for TLS-PSK
> > The benefits of TLS-PSK are in easing management and in administative
> > overhead, not in securing traffic from resourceful attackers.  Where
> > TLS-PSK is used across the Internet, PSKs MUST contain at least 256
> > octets of entropy.
> 
> Is it really 256 octets - 2048 bits, or should this be 256 bits - 32 octets?

  256 bits.  I'll fix that.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email