[radext] draft-hartman-radext-bigger-packets-01
Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 21:23 UTC
Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F271A048E for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:23:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EW0Aig84daPP for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:23:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700F21A0429 for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:23:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8105F2067E for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:19:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fCurouT2F7lV for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:19:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-50-177-27-27.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.177.27.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <radext@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:19:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id BDD74837C3; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:23:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: radext@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:23:17 -0500
Message-ID: <tsleh36k8qi.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/ogO-i0HwHpnNqxOB6_XKGsJC-zk
Subject: [radext] draft-hartman-radext-bigger-packets-01
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:23:24 -0000
hi folks. I just submitted version 01. Changes include: * Using Status-Server as a mechanism for discovering support for this in authentication and accounting flows. * Removing the diameter considerations section * Discussing the issue where multiple requests are outstanding. * Allocating the radius type we need. Hopefully I can sit down with Alan or someone else familiar with RADIUS IANA in London and get the right stuff together to allocate a code. I did not make any changes regarding using access-reject for the error case. Still waiting for input on that. Depending on how discussion goes in London, I'm likely to ask the chairs to consider adopting this draft.