IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] New DTLS document

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Mon, 29 April 2013 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E74C21F9D98 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ctv5g2clZ0lr for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9245B21F9D42 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A62C20248; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:22:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9XxDxd61oNIn; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:22:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-216-0-82.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.216.0.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:22:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 014FD4499; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:24:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
References: <516EA97E.2000005@deployingradius.com> <C47910C2-BCEA-4DC2-A016-C98D67B62DD9@gmail.com> <A95B4818FD85874D8F16607F1AC7C628B4032E@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <0E1BBA4B-1985-43C3-800A-AF336CABEF30@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:24:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <0E1BBA4B-1985-43C3-800A-AF336CABEF30@gmail.com> (Jouni Korhonen's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:32:28 +0300")
Message-ID: <tslsj298ime.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: radext@ietf.org, "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Subject: Re: [radext] New DTLS document
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:24:54 -0000

Question: is the text Joe is concerned about still intended to be in the
draft?
That is, do we still want to specify running both over the same port as
an option?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email