Re: [RAI] I-D's of former Sipping/Sip WG's

["James M. Polk" <[e-mail]>]

At 05:05 AM 7/18/2009, Adam Roach wrote:
>James M. Polk wrote:
>>well, then let's take this to a real example, with SIP Location Conveyance.
>>
>>This was a SIP WG item, with the last being rev-13.
>>
>>This doc moved directly to the SIPCORE WG, as SIPCORE Location 
>>Conveyance, and appeared to the casual observer as if this was the 
>>very first WG version in any WG.
>>
>>Thus providing an example of how the -00 through -13 versions in 
>>SIP are now not linked to the SIPCORE versions -00 and -01.
>
>The tools actually do allow for this.

It hasn't been done for any draft I've ever looked at, but you look 
at more than I do, so I guess I never noticed this possibility.

That's awesome that this is doable - and don't worry about missing 
this, it's important that it happens.

Thanks Adam

James

>For example, if you look at 
><http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-subnot-etags>, you'll 
>see that it links back to the draft-ietf-sip version in the "Versions" line.
>
>Unfortunately, this linking is a manual process, and some drafts 
>slip between the cracks. In this particular case, I dropped the 
>ball, and I apologize. I will send an email to the drafts 
>administrator to correct this problem momentarily.
>
>/a