IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RAI] I-D's of former Sipping/Sip WG's

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Sat, 18 July 2009 10:05 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rai@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rai@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1D028C0EF for <rai@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 03:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rw1yRjdaXB-f for <rai@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 03:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0A528C284 for <rai@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 03:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydra-3.local (ppp-70-249-149-101.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [70.249.149.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6IA5F5A023110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:05:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4A619E5A.6050807@nostrum.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:05:14 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
References: <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC3196C796014@mail> <4F527504-60B6-44A3-8CC1-61C3C4F1020F@voxeo.com> <A5B4A52A27C24737B2E5D8BF4E09DC47@china.huawei.com> <XFE-SJC-211mEKYQUgb00003445@xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFE-SJC-211mEKYQUgb00003445@xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 70.249.149.101 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: rai@ietf.org, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
Subject: Re: [RAI] I-D's of former Sipping/Sip WG's
X-BeenThere: rai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Real-time Applications and Infrastructure \(RAI\)" <rai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rai>
List-Post: <mailto:rai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai>, <mailto:rai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:05:37 -0000

James M. Polk wrote:
> well, then let's take this to a real example, with SIP Location 
> Conveyance.
>
> This was a SIP WG item, with the last being rev-13.
>
> This doc moved directly to the SIPCORE WG, as SIPCORE Location 
> Conveyance, and appeared to the casual observer as if this was the 
> very first WG version in any WG.
>
> Thus providing an example of how the -00 through -13 versions in SIP 
> are now not linked to the SIPCORE versions -00 and -01.

The tools actually do allow for this. For example, if you look at 
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-subnot-etags>, you'll see 
that it links back to the draft-ietf-sip version in the "Versions" line.

Unfortunately, this linking is a manual process, and some drafts slip 
between the cracks. In this particular case, I dropped the ball, and I 
apologize. I will send an email to the drafts administrator to correct 
this problem momentarily.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email