Re: [Rats] WGLC for draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sun, 11 October 2020 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1585A3A0CF4 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ps1gijgfh0kg for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5DD83A0CEE for <rats@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 09BI7oTn001640 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 11 Oct 2020 14:07:55 -0400
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:07:50 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Shwetha <shwetha.bhandari@gmail.com>
Cc: rats@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20201011180750.GA83747@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <CA+SnWFHFnmsqQJCT0eiE01hPTCGjBwVoBEZj+S8QUrhfAr6Zhw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+SnWFHFnmsqQJCT0eiE01hPTCGjBwVoBEZj+S8QUrhfAr6Zhw@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/84sXEqQ93SWy1mAP2S0zPcNa93A>
Subject: Re: [Rats] WGLC for draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 18:08:00 -0000

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 08:45:19PM +0530, Shwetha wrote:
> I have reviewed -04 of the document and support progressing it IESG. Some
> nits:
> 
> 1. Relook: It's an informational draft - section 2.3/2.4 and section 3 have
> RFC 2119 MUST/SHOULD

There is no requirement that BCP 14 keywords are only used in
standards-track documents; it is perfectly fine for them to appear in an
informational document.

-Ben