[Rats] I2NSF Remote Attestation Interface YANG Data Model
"yangpenglin@chinamobile.com" <yangpenglin@chinamobile.com> Mon, 06 June 2022 04:01 UTC
Return-Path: <yangpenglin@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0309BC14F6EC; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 21:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nzJmsi8dni1S; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 21:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831E9C14CF05; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 21:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.13]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app08-12008 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee8629d7c06a93-bbd81; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 12:01:12 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee8629d7c06a93-bbd81
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc-PC (unknown[10.2.50.192]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee7629d7c06fcd-b7232; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 12:01:12 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee7629d7c06fcd-b7232
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 12:01:12 +0800
From: "yangpenglin@chinamobile.com" <yangpenglin@chinamobile.com>
To: rats <rats@ietf.org>
Cc: "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.16.188[en]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2022060612011197557014@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart185718711451_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/9hRiGli0hSrgNtUkbb7v8Wd27kg>
Subject: [Rats] I2NSF Remote Attestation Interface YANG Data Model
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 04:01:19 -0000
Hi RATs group, Now we are trying to define NSF remote attestation architecture and YANG data models in I2NSF group. The detail could be found in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yang-i2nsf-remote-attestation-interface-dm/. This document follows the definition of I2NSF framework[RFC8329] and also could be treated as a use case of RATs. In detail, this document refers to the definition of RATs architecture to add new remote attestation components in I2NSF. This document refers to [I-D.ietf-rats-yang-tpm-charra] and [I-D.ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest]to define I2NSF YANG model for evidence in TPM-based platform. This document refers to [I-D.ietf-rats-eat] to define I2NSF YANG model for evidence in TEE-based platform. This document refers to [I-D.ietf-rats-ar4si] to defien I2NSF YANG model for attestation result. We want to align with RATs documents and make sure there is no conflict technically. So if there has any comments or suggestions, please let us know. BR. Penglin
- [Rats] I2NSF Remote Attestation Interface YANG Da… yangpenglin@chinamobile.com