IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] IANA pre-RFC code points

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Sat, 13 February 2021 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7762D3A10E0 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 15:01:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OlpmUJzbmuWk for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 15:01:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plsmtpa11-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa11-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D5DE3A10DC for <rats@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 15:01:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from laurences-mbp.gateway.2wire.net ([187.223.246.188]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id B3uvlWLx00AU2B3uwlvWRM; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:01:35 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=NJMQR22g c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60285a4f a=lSAU4oKFNE9jaKH9Gz7VXQ==:117 a=lSAU4oKFNE9jaKH9Gz7VXQ==:17 a=7CQSdrXTAAAA:8 a=dFldEHTz1CR8ZmBiX50A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=MyUmWlN0GOFyHEGAMcsA:9 a=DNEgEJrwsjwhn3Vp:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=a-qgeE7W1pNrGK8U0ZQC:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: lgl@island-resort.com
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
Message-Id: <D7AFAA80-B8EE-4657-8A81-71FE4F79E23B@island-resort.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C6D1E2C4-9B42-4B7A-8F78-C199BA87B3B1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:00:54 -0700
In-Reply-To: <80F4DFAD-8A5D-44DC-BEDF-BA96B7F21991@arm.com>
Cc: "Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>, Adrian Shaw <Adrian.Shaw@arm.com>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>, Simon Frost <Simon.Frost@arm.com>
To: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>
References: <80F4DFAD-8A5D-44DC-BEDF-BA96B7F21991@arm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfLuG/KISe8HXfQFnaLfw5Vz4u1ENenn2aw7sdlnA+eW/G6VncX2O7H85n56KHeGDo/2ia6OB2v5G3K96kn0xGopNquA8rSsJBHa3wwZ7qPxXtz+ctZ59 X/KvETH8njj3X8CmByVV+nLaYpoAnqtOrW4m18BADs0QFsDN4Z7x7Vo/32LOOWXlO0t1WrtkkfGuLGUMCxRjntyLILQpvzK1iJu9TE/z+F0+M6iwobF0kU6J 7utWSmPrHO7hePVPuEdNyacOzaYa8/94TK8EuF+9JOluF0Kj0B/+x7V7o3ehhdUW105XMqA3EKPW3jUbV6PL6l2kd2HD57OeeemuqSrSl4XIIquhZ2YfwC1J Zd4czwMeHiNcoCPNVDrCatrK7KeWaQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/KS9LRlw2AtGNgBKs_fnDtXaoq3w>
Subject: Re: [Rats] IANA pre-RFC code points
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 23:01:37 -0000

Profiles and are only in EAT drafts from the last month so they haven’t had much review or discussion. That makes them different from the other claims for which pre-assignment is requested.  I don’t think I have even presented them in detail in any meetings. So personally I am kind of on the fence about this.

A thorough reading and commenting by folks other than Arm would get me off the fence.

Happy to hear what the chairs think too.

LL


> On Feb 12, 2021, at 11:14 AM, Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> It'd be extremely useful to us if the "profile" claim could be added to
> the list early assignments.
> 
> That way the PSA token would just use the standard code point assigned
> to "profile" to create the context to interpret the rest of the private
> PSA claims - which means we would not need to make any further request
> to IANA.
> 
> Hopefully it is not too late to ask :-)
> 
> Cheers!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email