IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] IANA pre-RFC code points

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 05 February 2021 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976DD3A0AB4 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:10:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hozw30uW7suB for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5566B3A0AAF for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0335F38995; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:13:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uBjZ7PJb-G6J; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:13:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF35738990; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:13:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE768F8; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:10:41 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BCE1CEB5-9C76-4B1F-9532-971A9105BFA7@intel.com>
References: <BCE1CEB5-9C76-4B1F-9532-971A9105BFA7@intel.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 16:10:41 -0500
Message-ID: <25924.1612559441@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/SW5C_6dLwUxz62Hf9qNYOW7hVWM>
Subject: Re: [Rats] IANA pre-RFC code points
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 21:10:48 -0000

Smith, Ned <ned.smith@intel.com> wrote:
    > Folks, The EAT draft
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-eat/ contains proposed
    > IANA pre-RFC early assignment code point definitions in section 7.3.1.

    > The conditions for making an official IANA request are below in [c] and
    > [d].

    > Does the list believe the code points are stable?

Yes, I do.
But, the formatting of the table is a bit muddled.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email