Re: [Rats] WG call for adoption of draft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation

The plan is that this stays TPM-specific, right? That seems like a good choice as accommodating EAT would be a lot of work and change the scope of this document in a big way.

I also assume this is largely focused on network equipment and that it won’t attempt to address use cases like mobile phones and that it may be considered to have limited applicability for some IoT devices.

Assuming it is TPM and network specific, I think it is fine (+1 on adoption), but I think it needs to be clear about this in the Introduction and perhaps in other places.

LL

> On May 4, 2020, at 4:24 PM, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello RATs participants,
>  
> This email begins a 2 week adoption call (ending on May 18)
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fedorkow-rats-network-device-attestation/>
>  
> If you have objections to adopting this draft, please respond by EOD May 18.
>  
> Thanks, Nancy
>  
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> RATS@ietf.org <mailto:RATS@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>