[Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (was: Re: Re: Threat model and properties for remote attestation)
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 19 August 2026 15:57 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2106D12C53FC9 for <rats@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1787155032; bh=jGF3I1e+Yj7yGG3TgWT8AZo8YvyOfE+Anzjb70r5gkY=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=N2gOYneIZvrGNx+Dqn8uvwC6oHk2FdN8Ep/xW8T5PtCaNuwnxEz9h1fzpR6gGg6Qb XVNbg79aU80ThH7rDgZ6K+gcPk59EEgVm9Fv3OdPX8YEKspm8Dq0/CKmKLbPvFdmCo f8fRC7BYby2FntkjkGMdmG+W4/BruBffT79r6k5M=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rRMdaeDwO95s for <rats@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 906D312C53FC1 for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CDE18011; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 11:57:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id mFitqPuGxeHi; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 11:57:10 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1787155030; bh=sYpu40jzkzl/eT8Dfc2y0SBoV7juMl1xG87p1rb4vIU=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=UZddOtdGfSivYkFuyYsFd3BcMqYFWeN1zs4FZuPWPoQPjahz3HXjyQUNd/xVCEGLN Ten+aCbsDQEGLHrfIi7rtIbANBSnDrIv5aS9oPRFBaHxvEzVZ13PiOUM9DKNMntzFe T/L+GZhX0wPALE5H2WXfUYFrZjf41byCxhFcZwUbYxGu7oHEX4mtPuUQEXEP9IYTyQ C7A1THpQMPXhuO6TbZOS3tRhCo8ns0+UreAcCLttsVJYOXcdnQOrmCOJ9+NtnkocDZ jcTsujbRNhVtSGlmTZM/bDn4NLYDXkOUWXk0XmlniYVzMR/+fzVjt9clGCmZFgCRTN AWBo3EzOZiBlA==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041FA1800F; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 11:57:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4180182; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 11:57:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Henri Sirkkavaara <hello@vaara.io>, rats <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3RmVv323eL-LMc7GbglftSy2HW_XjuyKLlDBHJMBLj7MxUt_1eH61_dqPXVFCubudwwpfyqe_FcaX3qgSJLJEWf_mnGMk5LoH2w_amc7I5k=@vaara.io>
References: <SN6PR04MB4816FEA3B54F9FB75E2C43BCC6DA2@SN6PR04MB4816.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CAHu=PL0hbQQJDb__SixNxjCaLnYJtCRxod0xM5tQHb0H71++Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxYnaM8hTFrTVOes7oRPB1OfR9z6eEA2G=hfWz+n4hRqUycBQ@mail.gmail.com> <x-zrBdw00QYsru0IX_AlJ8MI2O_wo8v7wMAJAgU8LJqO7N2Dy2cmrAKwrpooGMfJDA0mTFHdRI6sqiTitgZPQeh_HiR-t4RdZvk15kUQUG4=@vaara.io> <CAHxYnaPsWxeq_0Cf3KSVp-O59dEAtYj1VtBsG2c=+vpt9+w8gQ@mail.gmail.com> <giyMaok_sM5hOnLqdAikzspcQdPN4ZXGJYbvdmUWdrz-eZmzSB8NBoWZER70CPIZyvlVp_ayje0OaNDuhcxw-pru7JXD_QFk4DGhecyAWt4=@vaara.io> <18362.1786822018@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <jHcEen5I2mG6YKeIbiCZe_xUiwaOO034RZaM7s-G_pXJEyb4HGDzqRXs91iySfuZX7tlcHFTZsN6D_4Xr1IecTKab0OW6TDWuKNsbLao-QI=@vaara.io> <3RmVv323eL-LMc7GbglftSy2HW_XjuyKLlDBHJMBLj7MxUt_1eH61_dqPXVFCubudwwpfyqe_FcaX3qgSJLJEWf_mnGMk5LoH2w_amc7I5k=@vaara.io>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; Emacs 30.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 11:57:09 -0400
Message-ID: <5113.1787155029@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: U5QJPKGL4UV7OIPZXXZJQZ446QSSZMSL
X-Message-ID-Hash: U5QJPKGL4UV7OIPZXXZJQZ446QSSZMSL
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rats.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (was: Re: Re: Threat model and properties for remote attestation)
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/bp0bNAHg6N5ZgSNPoRoiWXxHS1w>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rats-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rats-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rats-leave@ietf.org>
Henri Sirkkavaara <hello@vaara.io> wrote:
> On privacy, the record does not carry evidence. It carries a
> digest. evidenceRef.digest pins the normalized evidence and the
> envelope commits to it under signature, so whether anything identifying
> exists in the artifact is an operator decision about what goes into the
> evidence in the first place. The format does not require identifying
> material and a careless deployment can still put it there.
What is this envelope?
This sounds a bit like SD-CWT?
I'm unclear if there is any integrity for these measurements.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
** My working hours and your working hours may be different. **
** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours **
- [Rats] Re: Threat model and properties for remote… Nathanael Ritz
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Ned Smith IETF
- [Rats] Re: Threat model and properties for remote… Thomas Fossati
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Manu Fontaine
- [Rats] Re: Threat model and properties for remote… Manu Fontaine
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Nathanael Ritz
- [Rats] qualifying "confidential computing" (was: … Thomas Fossati
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Manu Fontaine
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Henri Sirkkavaara
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Thomas Fossati
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Nathanael Ritz
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Henri Sirkkavaara
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Manu Fontaine
- [Rats] Re: Threat model and properties for remote… Mandyam, Giridhar
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Michael Richardson
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Henri Sirkkavaara
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Henri Sirkkavaara
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Michael Richardson
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Michael Richardson
- [Rats] Re: qualifying "confidential computing" (w… Ned Smith IETF