[Rats] Quantum-safe attestation
Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Mon, 24 August 2020 18:04 UTC
Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05653A0980 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Glw5ES4NE77b for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa07-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa07-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA063A0983 for <rats@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.78] ([76.167.193.86]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPA id AGpskqxWkCtRoAGpskPSzm; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:04:48 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Qu4gIm6d c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=t2DvPg6iSvRzsOFYbaV4uQ==:117 a=t2DvPg6iSvRzsOFYbaV4uQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=1uOtSH1RXhCRRGUQolUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=nt3jZW36AmriUCFCBwmW:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: lgl@island-resort.com
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
Message-Id: <B12C563A-066F-4FB7-934D-48D1373206E5@island-resort.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:04:48 -0700
To: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCvs3gS8o9p7iOTebQpC1HjLSGRXbzWIM6FW4ackR6Qyw6B38SlMYD7aFZC/bULM2EMknPpjoEwqFHfk0yTA6y+18vrTEVwur90VF08yyTJ8pLREMbr3 vVT4mNgJysYCoiimyuO3XacI0GkH+gGK/OLktWlcCByG9h0/PXqCMd3R
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/mD5wk08gkBsjg8mnfyBkt_tfIWY>
Subject: [Rats] Quantum-safe attestation
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:04:50 -0000
We probably want RATS architecture to be able to use quantum-safe algorithms. On low cost and low speed devices that might mean HMAC is used since SHA-2 and such seem to be quantum-safe. On higher cost and higher speed devices there may be alternatives that look more like PKI. Comments? LL
- [Rats] Quantum-safe attestation Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] Quantum-safe attestation Salz, Rich
- Re: [Rats] Quantum-safe attestation Michael Richardson
- Re: [Rats] Quantum-safe attestation Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Rats] Quantum-safe attestation Panwei (William)
- Re: [Rats] Quantum-safe attestation Smith, Ned