IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rats] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-ear-04.txt

Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de> Sun, 14 June 2026 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
X-Original-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111BD1011779D for <rats@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 08:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1781452159; bh=kRAECr3FTudf8LYd4ZTiHObuQ5WwUeornLYYvM27m9E=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=fiUDzb7sM1yUL/6nBMwt6J0nFrSID8aLGlTtzk5Efd0hOe1YKO6ELmATgrz78Nr9C Uj7Xda2qGbLV5pcg9x4KiLDS41+h0a7PEVz14qPWEmlzWXejDnkCOffsXDjLGWsYk4 DGMJ2u22AWs3O0lLK/22j5sSIQ225BkpRQy+wDag=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tu-dresden.de
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yr3l0j-A6u29 for <rats@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 08:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de [141.76.32.220]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD5110117793 for <rats@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 08:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tu-dresden.de; s=dkim2022; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PxDHDj4QbSQzxNGIKqSOPJ/ZBdEaeUm1Ds29SftO5ZE=; b=bwNEXWLznJiqNlQ4o23+w7NJ5F t5mKSfswq6BRj0Ukl6y9/QPVJQV3qO7mkNXJlOLjsxbnYs6o2s7bW95nij6F5BIC3nNf4cA6BGPfD rDtPqfaRKjUw0Pduqe4bvB4mJloiVPZ5AwkskxVRoDEVEW5kkAvyFLroX+7l/RIOQTA8O3NcLiYkM 4Vo0C3VqL8+WoPRXWOfsOUjQCEkLeHQaK8eliOm2HeEVrNNtUZueq4D+RWtvvYznI935WyNMeD4uS OhvDasnK0H9xsh428CpNXg6FhHNe4hcElIvCO6Hc8CwOcyBlbdaXmHjyDaeythfUI+JYRyOCEis2Z c+quF0Uw==;
Received: from msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de ([172.26.35.139] helo=msx.tu-dresden.de) by mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>) id 1wYn5C-00GLRi-0m; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:49:17 +0200
Received: from [10.12.5.228] (141.76.13.165) by msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.43; Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:49:05 +0200
Message-ID: <0f9c86f7-abdf-4cb4-9067-79a281d32e01@tu-dresden.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 17:49:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Nathanael Ritz <nathanritz@gmail.com>, rats@ietf.org
References: <177979461501.860642.12102997924387917673@dt-datatracker-5b4c8598b5-4ztf9> <CA+1=6ycGS0_aWN2QS0NekBc5G+02M8h3buhado90rrwgvFsM-Q@mail.gmail.com> <14c17207-95ba-391a-f05c-180c6de66666@ietf.contact> <CA+1=6yfrNaqQUnMuQMo9XCYOqa_7K34eS+59+wsU3eJRfErONg@mail.gmail.com> <1971324.1779996819@dyas> <CA+1=6ydMA4-M1hsvYedH8qOsPmoF4HRsaGunCppsxU7T7yx86Q@mail.gmail.com> <11839.1780168291@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAHxYnaP9xgGO3RJ32uRC764QW5nUfspGwc+Wwp5YaopsuLGaag@mail.gmail.com> <3080.1780934453@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CA+1=6yeqSgcR1sXTNYD98Zy5aTDK8mY9d8kbq4k9Vm5VitQRrw@mail.gmail.com> <11827.1781016447@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <5C0A3729-A301-4F0F-BCE1-B370E8F2E5EA@redhoundsoftware.com> <CAHxYnaPSdsL9hMPJ6PnvfiDQkcaXk=jbMOxFMFMZ3T3UMi8vpA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxYnaOvmsgU0vfRPigETmQgavG7Mu+75mbt_2q+oMhRMGM7aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAHxYnaOvmsgU0vfRPigETmQgavG7Mu+75mbt_2q+oMhRMGM7aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms010209080300030600060900"
X-ClientProxiedBy: MSX-T415.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.135) To msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.139)
X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de
Message-ID-Hash: T22YSERG73Y74VLKLNJDS4DWWWUVJCMK
X-Message-ID-Hash: T22YSERG73Y74VLKLNJDS4DWWWUVJCMK
X-MailFrom: muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rats.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Rats] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rats-ear-04.txt
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/mriS-OlJkvmJDUwX7cxULvzXaXU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rats-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rats-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rats-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Nathanael,

On 14.06.26 03:52, Nathanael Ritz wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Nathanael Ritz* <nathanritz@gmail.com>
>
> […] however, I am personally allergic to avoidable `if..then` code 
> blocks, and I believe that is fundamentally what Thomas is advocating 
> for here.
>
> —-
>
> I meant to say: “and I believe Thomas is advocating [against avoidable 
> ‘if…then’ code blocks]”.
>
> Whichever way that supports your position is what I wanted to 
> communicate anyway.

Could you please clarify if you are supporting Henk's position here?

Best,

-Usama

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status