IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-rats-architecture-21: (with COMMENT)

Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io> Thu, 08 September 2022 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BBBC14CE37 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 19:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=aiven.io
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEmDJdfdlJZQ for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 19:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com (mail-ej1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FBF0C14CE36 for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 19:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id dv25so5572071ejb.12 for <rats@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 19:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aiven.io; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=e+bLSPb22UIUptBY0xIfANeaBXxoJcHX67PN0JPe/Sk=; b=qQsSPIYeqMW0J7f0p2wkcGO5iQRPP9oQI42utr9X/sZqfM65NSWudtDcBOBqZFzv+1 Uxq8Rt33BUOciD2nZTzcaJEhtQ5gfBv7tgIPMI74sSS+LwWzs6RS8K1/NOESbgu9rO1m Q+x+FDFDmytrFNqppq71HMOuN+AawGrMgtnww=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=e+bLSPb22UIUptBY0xIfANeaBXxoJcHX67PN0JPe/Sk=; b=PjzsFEEemybMhqCC3yVfsOSqrxUpnaVZLqAu2TGFYoVDmUV3Z9YbnjPIJjoCVrxzJ0 tg2NtDfsdZUJgcew+eP94Kiz0P5C/RufTzXoPAELGR1L2FWx9N6ywhJZsERvez9MS51q Fc/IBJtye7hGdpwsslyRg4DsU4EG/xlgPcheywcE5M3LuP6QCHCy6FzrocCSZPYfvkMu tfQVPpo2D5CSIdIf/T56FE7VP9oZWFtGS9FMgD7Sp+tBkAfbsd7gTkEg6mIAGHD4ffRa fkosPwHp3+1vXICJ5Ci457sYW30EBcHQH2kaau5JuU3nUXxsJpQneUaS/JRx/YazoWNg 3CMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1Pz5L7+P/IhXRvrAlchmNsQUNgQsxczQJH4iXrahLwb0GlGikj w7U+dcANDKIca8x5JSYwXz4xM5iExh/Og+rZr2+pQA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5gXl3ELYeS3AuSVS5Gnoam6vvLV2pDivv+l7tt2U+nh2H/5bshl2eXc6E1/t2XltFuMjRz8z++NIcpYgrQNHM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9721:b0:741:5c68:a0a4 with SMTP id jg33-20020a170907972100b007415c68a0a4mr4384702ejc.81.1662605473548; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 19:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166258803083.57470.128494099506736352@ietfa.amsl.com> <BN2P110MB110759C6DD4CC31CFFF8BDDBDC419@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <BN2P110MB110759C6DD4CC31CFFF8BDDBDC419@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 22:51:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGL5yWZgA9MhOfu0S4DRmgjxfbk5BMX4S9B=OO9123AMCayURA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rats-architecture@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rats-architecture@ietf.org>, "rats-chairs@ietf.org" <rats-chairs@ietf.org>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>, "Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a7247a05e8218030"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/nub-uzhB93FSLAraXi8FlJ22dcQ>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-rats-architecture-21: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 02:51:20 -0000

On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 6:14 PM Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:

>
> [snip]
>
> > #3  IPR
> >
> > I am a little concerned about the IPR claims filed. Intel reserves the
> right to
> > charge, and Huawei only allows free use for Section 4.3 and 6 despite
> that
> > there is no Section 4.3 and it makes little sense for Section 6 ? I also
> > believe that this document merely lists very generic concepts based on
> known
> > prior art (but I am not a lawyer)
>
> Understood.  The WG discussed how to handle this situation --
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/3nCTOkNYW8ydEo0zHZlQoY8F92A/.
> Ultimately, they decided to proceed with publication in spite of these IPR
> claims.
>

Thanks for the information. Happy to hear this was a well discussed issue.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email