Re: [Raw] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-08

[CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[e-mail]>]

Hi Suresh,

Thanks a lot for your review. Please, see inline below some responses from
our side.

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 5:32 AM Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-raw-use-cases.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
> Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments
> just
> like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
> them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For
> more
> details on the INT Directorate, see
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.
>
>
> Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot a NO OBJECTION on
> this
> document. The document is well written and easy to understand. There are a
> few
> minor issues I found that you may wish to address.
>
> Minor issues:
>
> * Section 1
>
> The following text looks a bit out of date since 5G has already been
> deployed for
> quite some time.
>
> "*  IMT-2020 has recognized Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication
>     (URLLC) as a key functionality for the upcoming 5G."
>
> It probably needs to be rewritten.
>

[Carlos] Yes, thanks for pointing this out. We will rewrite this in the
next revision of the draft.


>
> * Section 2
>
> I know the developments are fairly new but have you considered how LEO
> satellite technology affects this area?
>
> [Carlos] Good point. I will ask the experts in the aeronautical area in
the WG to propose a way to address this comment.


> * Section 4.3
>
> Would it be useful to refer to RFC9030 in addition to RFC7554 to point
> to related IETF work?
>

[Carlos] Yes, thanks. We'll add this reference.

Thanks!

Carlos