Re: [Raw] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-08: (with COMMENT)

[CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[e-mail]>]

Dear Rob,

Thanks a lot for your review comments. Please see inline below some
responses.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 6:24 PM Robert Wilton via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-08: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-raw-use-cases/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for an informative read.  I just had one minor question/comment on
> this
> doc:
>
>    *  Wireless Console Gaming: Playing online on a console has 2 types
>       of internet connectivity, which is either wired or Wi-Fi.  Most of
>       the gaming consoles today support Wi-Fi 5.  But Wi-Fi has an
>       especially bad reputation among the gaming community.  The main
>       reasons are high latency, lag spikes, and jitter.
>
> Is the concern here just about how the console is connected to the Internet
> (which could be wired or wireless), and/or how the handheld controllers are
> connected to the console (which could also be wired or wireless)?
> Presumably
> both of these could be in scope for RAW?  E.g., I thought that one of the
> alleged benefits of Google's project Stadia was that it was meant to reduce
> latency for cloud gaming via going directly from the handheld controller
> to the
> router without going via a console or PC.
>
> [Carlos] Both are indeed in scope. We will add some text to make this
point clearer.

Thanks,

Carlos


> Thanks,
> Rob
>
>
>
>