[Raw] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-08: (with COMMENT)

[Robert Wilton via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-raw-use-cases/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Thanks for an informative read.  I just had one minor question/comment on this
doc:

   *  Wireless Console Gaming: Playing online on a console has 2 types
      of internet connectivity, which is either wired or Wi-Fi.  Most of
      the gaming consoles today support Wi-Fi 5.  But Wi-Fi has an
      especially bad reputation among the gaming community.  The main
      reasons are high latency, lag spikes, and jitter.

Is the concern here just about how the console is connected to the Internet
(which could be wired or wireless), and/or how the handheld controllers are
connected to the console (which could also be wired or wireless)?  Presumably
both of these could be in scope for RAW?  E.g., I thought that one of the
alleged benefits of Google's project Stadia was that it was meant to reduce
latency for cloud gaming via going directly from the handheld controller to the
router without going via a console or PC.

Thanks,
Rob