Re: [Raw] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-raw-architecture-11

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Dear All,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.

Regards,
Greg (as a contributor)

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:43 AM Eve Schooler <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, WGs,
>
> In tandem with WG Last Call, and in preparation for re-issuing the draft (as it is expired at present) and the transition to roll the RAW WG back into DetNet,
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate. If you are listed as a document author, co-author, or contributor
> please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
>
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINE.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please seehttps://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/
>
> Thank you,
> Eve (as Shepherd)
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>