[rddp] No RDDP meeting in Minneapolis

Black_David@emc.com Thu, 03 March 2005 08:26 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA18933 for <rddp-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 03:26:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D6lgQ-0000jR-1Z for rddp-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:27:46 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D6lea-00005c-T4; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:25:53 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D6leQ-000052-GP for rddp@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:25:42 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA18852 for <rddp@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 03:25:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com ([168.159.2.31]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D6lfk-0000hL-MZ for rddp@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:27:04 -0500
Received: from mxic2.corp.emc.com (mxic2.corp.emc.com [128.221.12.9]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id j238PX5a028345 for <rddp@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 03:25:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mxic2.corp.emc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <FTSXVGDJ>; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 03:25:27 -0500
Message-ID: <B459CE1AFFC52D4688B2A5B842CA35EA07E5CF34@corpmx14.corp.emc.com>
To: rddp@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:25:25 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=, SPAM=0%, Reasons='EMC_BODY_1+ -5, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Subject: [rddp] No RDDP meeting in Minneapolis
X-BeenThere: rddp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Remote Direct Data Placement \(rddp\) WG" <rddp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp>, <mailto:rddp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rddp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rddp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp>, <mailto:rddp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rddp-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rddp-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8

Given the absence of open technical issues for the RDDP
WG arising from the recent WG Last Call or otherwise,
the RDDP WG meeting in Minneapolis next week is canceled.

I will be available in the bar area at the meeting hotel
during the currently scheduled meeting time slot (1645-1745
on Tuesday, March 8th) for anyone who would like to discuss
status of WG drafts and items.  Here is the status of the
RDDP WG's drafts:

Problem Statement (draft-ietf-rddp-problem-statement-05.txt)
	Approved for publication as an informational RFC,
	currently in RFC Editor's Queue
Architecture (draft-ietf-rddp-arch-07.txt)
	Revised -07 version has addressed IESG comments.
	WG chair is working on getting draft approved for
	publication as an informational RFC.

DDP (draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-04.txt)
RDMAP (draft-ietf-rddp-rdmap-03.txt)
Security (draft-ietf-rddp-security-06.txt)
	Completed WG Last Call with no outstanding technical
	issues.  To be revised by end of March - plan is to
	submit to our AD and the IESG requesting standards
	track RFC publication in April, meeting the current
	milestones on the RDDP WG's charter.

SCTP Mapping (draft-ietf-rddp-sctp-01.txt)
Applicability (draft-ietf-rddp-applicability-02.txt)
MPA [TCP mapping] (draft-ietf-rddp-mpa-02.txt)
	Will enter WG Last Call shortly after Minneapolis
	meeting week (next week).  SCTP Mapping is intended
	to become a standards track RFC, Applicability is
	intended to become an Informational RFC, and
	whether MPA is to become Standards Track vs.
	Informational will be determined after conclusion
	of WG Last Call.  With luck, these will be submitted
	to our AD and the IESG well in advance of the September
	2005 milestone date on the RDDP WG's charter.

Concerns (draft-ietf-rddp-rdma-concerns-01.txt)
	For the information of the WG.  Not intended for
	publication as an RFC.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp